PORNOLATION RELEASE

Hi,

when using diffrent routing tables, outgoing packets after SNAT always have
hw-adresses as if the packed was coming from my machine. So a forwarded
packet to default gw x on eth0 gets hw-adresses as if the same packet with
origin loopback was routed to default gw y on network wlan0 which is
diffrent.
I do "ip rule add iif lo table mine" and some "ip route add ... table mine"
for local generated traffic. My "main" rt is configured for forwared traffic.
"iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to 192.168.1.10" for NAT.
(eth1 <-> [NAT] <-> eth0, [local]<->[wlan0]).

Thanks for your help

Markus

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

From: "Alex Samad" samad.com.au>

Please note my checking of marked traffic is not ( according to the earlier posts )

However, it is :-

I leave it to you guys to decide which is the correct syntax.

The code below is taken from part of my bigger code :-

Cheers.
---------------------code-------------------------------------------

Hello

I've setuped a bridge with l7-filter and ipp2p. We have every day + or
- between 10Mbits and 30 Mbits P2P traffic from + or - 450 customers.
When traffic increase. I've got this kind of error message :

Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: printk: 38 messages suppressed.
Feb 23 14:26:19 gestor1 kernel: ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.

The server is celeron pentium 4 based 3Ghz + 512Mb ram
Does anyone could suggest me what are the best value for

net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_max
net.ipv4.netfilter.ip_conntrack_tcp_timeout_established

Might be I can tune other kernel value ?
Thanks for your help

Regards

On Fri, Feb 23, 2007 at 03:23:42PM +0800, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:

hi

sorry missed the previous bits of the thread, could you post the relevant info,
interested to see how this works and why you would pick it over the multipath
method

I've just check my kernel compilation and NAPI is enabled for twice nics...
Normally load should appear on "top" or "uptime" command ?

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hello there,

Traffic shaping tool

ttshaper 1.0

released!

For more info, visit http://exef.xko.cz/others/others.htm

Regards,
Tom

ExEf - the Ultimate Effect Processor - GNU Linux
*** http://exef.xko.cz ***
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hello,

I've setuped an ethernet bridge on a debian sarge 3.1 with l7-filter +
ipp2 shapper rules
The server is a supermicro p4sci + celeron pentium 4 base 3ghz + 512Mb
+ 2 ethernet e1000

One interface is connected to a cisco catalyst switch
The other interface is connected directly to a CMTS (a sort of router
for cable modem) configured as bridge too.

More than 20Mbps of bandwith cross this bridge. Most of this traffic is
p2p (~80%%)
When traffic goes over 14Mbps the bridge seems to saturate (overflow ?
) and start to make colision and loose packets

I've take a look to this paper
http://facweb.cti.depaul.edu/jyu/Publications/Yu-Linux-TSM2004.pdf

And with a duron 1,3Ghz+512 mbps he obtain these values

On Wednesday 21 February 2007 23:58, Ming-Ching Tiew wrote:

sory a brain-o, but in the email refered is well explained.

Hello again