|
|
 Up |
  |
EL TIEMPO DE LA NUEVA YORK TRIES TO REGAIN "CREDIBILITY" 
Date: Nov 17, 2006 13:25
Yup........El Tiempo de la Nueva York, after Losing Readers and
Traitorously Printing Classified Information which Helps America's
Enemies, is now trying to Regain some "Credibility" by seemingly
Attacking Nancy Pelosi's recent "Gaffe".........It sort of makes me
wonder if the Whole Situation wasn't set up In Part to allow the
Leftist Media a chance to "Redeem" themselves?..........Most Observers
KNEW Murtha WASN'T going to win anyways.........It has the SMELL of
being "Staged" for a PURPOSE.............Heehee..........
"El Tiempo de la Nueva York
November 17, 2006
Editorial
Speaker Pelosi Tempts Disaster
|
| Show full article (1.16Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Re: Election Day Special: About Those Supposedly "Forged" CBS Memos...
Author: BC Date: Nov 17, 2006 13:21
KK wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:02:25 -0800, BC wrote:
>
>> Am I really the one trying to "prove a negative" here?
>
> Yes.
>
>
>
>> Consider the two basic scenarios involving the memos:
>>
>> A) The memos were forged with Word
>
> That you list "A)" only underscores that you're choosing a convenient
> target - the negative you're proving. Whether or not you disprove "A)"
> means *nothing*. Zero. It's a canard, a distraction.
Not so fast there -- that sounds like you're saying that the
claim of how Word was used to forge the memos is irrelevant
to a discussion on whether the memos were forged or not.
|
| Show full article (0.69Kb) |
| 14 Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Election Day Special: About Those Supposedly "Forged" CBS Memos...
Author: BC Date: Nov 17, 2006 13:02
KK wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:51:30 -0800, BC wrote:
>
>> and try to find anything
>> factual in its argument for the memos being fakes
>
>
> And, in the interest of fairness and rationality, also look for *any*
> legitimate attempt at professional forensic document verification.
>
> There are lots of people like BC with clenched fists, gritted
> teeth, and red faces, just wishing they were real. If that were the case,
> it would be trivial to produce some of the basic evidence that's been
> taked about here.
>
> It hasn't been. Instead, BC has taken everyone on a diversionary detour
> from the truth to challenge his detractors to prove a negative.
Am I really the one trying to "prove a negative" here?
Consider the two basic scenarios involving the memos:
|
| Show full article (2.10Kb) |
| 1 Comment |
|
|
The religious right's last rites
Author: Harry Hope Date: Nov 17, 2006 13:01
From The Guardian, 11/17/06:
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/alan_wolfe/2006/11/alan_wolfe_1.html
The religious right's last rites
The GOP's failure in the midterms is a sign that American evangelicals
should give up politics.
By Alan Wolfe
The "I told you so" messages are beginning to arrive, none more
prominent than the New York Times op ed written by David Kuo, formerly
of the Bush administration's Office of Faith-Based and Community
Initiatives.
Kuo's book Tempting Faith had demonstrated the degree to which
evangelicals were used by the Bush administration for its own, not
very religious, ends.
But another message of his book seems especially resonant in the
aftermath of the 2006 elections.
Evangelicals, Kuo argued, were too quick to put their historically and
theologically informed reservations about politics aside in their
desire to see conservatives in power.
|
| Show full article (4.48Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Re: Any good LC Cereal left?
Author: Dr. Ernst Primer (again) Date: Nov 17, 2006 12:57
Pat in TX wrote:
>>
>> I'm not whining, just pointing out how immature it is that people like
>> you have the compelling need to put their politics into LC posts. But
>> obviously people like you can't shut up, win or lose. If you win, you
>> gloat. If you lose, you bitch for years about the election supposidly
>> being illegitimate. Funny thing isn't it? When the Republicans
>> lose, the whole thing is over the day after the election. They
>> gratiously concede defeat. No endless recounts, no lawyering up, no
>> claims of hanging chads or voter fraud. We just put it in the past
>> and move on, because the election is over and it doesn't do any good to
>> gloat or complain.
>
> You do like those blinders, don't you?
>>
I can't resist this:
http://tinyurl.com/y3goqa
WASHINGTON, DC-Republican officials are blaming tonight's GOP losses
on Democrats, who they claim have engaged in a wide variety of
"aggressive, premeditated, anti-Republican campaigns" over the past
six...
|
| Show full article (1.66Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: HEEHEE!! - "WAL-MART CRITIC JOHN EDWARDS SHOPS AT WAL-MART"...
Date: Nov 17, 2006 12:38
abracadabra wrote:
>
> In the first place the story is false.
NOT at all........It happened, Edwards acknowledged it happened to the
AP, and the only "question" is his Flaky "Excuse"..........Which is a
Typical WEASEL...........
> 1) He could hire somebody to stand in line
But he DIDN'T..........
> 2) He could go through ebay
But he DIDN'T............Besides, Ebay is for "Common People"
donchaknow.........
> Do you really believe that people with $50,000,000+ in the bank "stand in
> line" when they want to buy something?
If they want it Bad Enough, YES.........People with Lots of Money also
Shit in a Toilet just like the Rest Of Us, you know........."Angels"
DON'T show up on a Cloud to Spirit Away their Poop..........
> Aside from that, I happen to live not only in the same town as Edwards, I
> live two frigging driveways down.
|
| Show full article (1.50Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
