wiadomość:fn2vla$k8c$7@news.albasani.net, nadawca:Zeitgeist Użytkownik Skrypëk napisał: Zeitgeist nabazgrał: Użytkownik Skrypëk napisał: Zeigeist nabazgrał: ÓÓÓÓ http://zeitgeistmovie.com/ Part 1, demaskujący jaką bzdurą są religie, jest faktycznie ciekawy. Part 2 i 3 to oklepane już przez Michaela Moore'a i Alexa Jones teorie spiskowe, tyle że przedstawione
Użytkownik Skrypëk napisał: Zeigeist nabazgrał: ÓÓÓÓ http://zeitgeistmovie.com/ Part 1, demaskujący jaką bzdurą są religie, jest faktycznie ciekawy. Part 2 i 3 to oklepane już przez Michaela Moore'a i Alexa Jones teorie spiskowe, tyle że przedstawione w trochę bardziej racjonalny sposób niż u ww. oszołomów. I tak sięhuja znasz -- http://zeitgeistmovie.com/
On Nov 25, 8:59 am, analys...@hotmail.com wrote: (2) Although non-racist, non-nationalistic non-religious purely academic methods as practiced today (any number of present day indian scholars probably accept the orthodoxy) claim to prove this genetic relationship - the relationship was already claimed for racist, imperialistic reasons by William Jones. So what? Abraham Lincoln didn't
On Nov 25, 7:15 am, "Duan Vukotic" <dusan.vuko...@gmail.com> wrote: On Nov 25, 12:27 pm, analys...@hotmail.com wrote: These emotinal responses don't show you guys in a good light. What I am denying is his claim of refutations of my postings. It is true that some data and elementary principles have been posted but those I can get myself but it is patently obvious that nobody
Craig M wrote: On Oct 26, 4:55 pm, marc <initial.surn...@btinternet.com> wrote: The suggestion is that the law makers got things wrong by using a nebulous term such as "indecent", whilst having decision based on the zeigeist is usefull in that you don't need to keep redrafting legisalation to keep up with opinion, it doesn't seem to have been needed in offences such as murder
