david7gable@aol.com wrote: Mr. Clarke doesn't object to Wilhelm Müller's poem on technical or aesthetic grounds: he's outraged by a sensibility that offends him in large part on moral grounds. For example, he objects to what he characterizes as the narcissism of the sentiments Müller expresses. On purely technical grounds, Müller is clearly the superior poet. Paul McCartney

Pete Monsta wrote: In article <EZ_Fh.32633$s47.19321@newsfe4-gui.ntli.net>, john.briggs4 @ntlworld.com wrote... It have been far better to base the project on a 16th century breviary and the printed 16th century Antiphonal, consulting other sources as necessary. The trouble with the printed musical sources is that they are so full of misprints as to be virtually useless

<bobgrumman@nut-n-but.net> wrote in message news:1168702187.684583.233060@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com... As you know, I abominate your neologisms, What is wrong with English? Although I am always pleased to annoy you, Paul, I used the neology I did because I could find no term in English that means what it is intended to mean. Use a phrase in ordinary English words. I have