In message <grek849o0rtok6pspok2ff7q3vl1hn9hik@4ax.com>, "David Loewe, Jr." <dloewe@mindspring.com> writes On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:42:29 +0100, "Paul J. Adam" <news@jrwlynch.demon.co.uk> wrote: No, Mr Loewe, Paul does not agree that William introduced the *concept* of extermination camps to the conversation. Really? Yes, really. Then why did you answer "An extermination camp
In message <hd0k84lcf6or9uqe20j8lvjakliniftorf@4ax.com>, "David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@charter.net> writes Paul, Fred and I all AGREE that YOU introduced the *concept* of extermination camps to the conversation, Mr. Black No, Mr Loewe, Paul does not agree that William introduced the *concept* of extermination camps to the conversation. The *concept* of extermination camps is widely and
In message <o5ai8414kpj5706ss2hura23jvfkofpmlo@4ax.com>, "David V. Loewe, Jr" <daveloewe@charter.net> writes On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:45:24 +0100, "Paul J. Adam" <news@jrwlynch.demon.co.uk> wrote: No mention of Guantanamo Bay anywhere in his statement. <sigh> How many times do you have to be told that there were only TWO camps under discussion and his statement specifically excluded
In message <gfph84dlgaq522u4as8vapuqqkrla2f8lj@4ax.com>, "David Loewe, Jr." <dloewe@mindspring.com> writes On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:09:49 +0100, "Paul J. Adam" <news@jrwlynch.demon.co.uk> wrote: You're accusing him of calling Guantanamo Bay an extermination camp. Can you quote him? I have. No mention of Guantanamo Bay anywhere in his statement. Oh, wait, he said "the function was
On Jul 24, 4:09 pm, "Paul J. Adam" <n...@jrwlynch.demon.co.uk> wrote: In message <f2mh841r2uri1rgb1r69vts002m66js...@4ax.com>, "David V. Loewe, Jr" <davelo...@charter.net> writes On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:03:30 +0100, "Paul J. Adam" <n...@jrwlynch.demon.co.uk> wrote: "David Loewe, Jr." <dlo...@mindspring.com> writes "There was no intent to kill the occupants of the South African
