tsu rockets
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 46 articles for 0.316 sec
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:36:33 -0700, tankfixer <paul.carrier@gmail.comm> wrote: > In article <op.uepjtu0hra3qj7@schooner-blue>, mi5ke562@att.net says... >> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:31:04 -0700, tankfixer <paul.carrier@gmail.comm> >> wrote: >> >> > In article <op.uefaeud1ra3qj7@schooner-blue>, mi5ke562@att.net says... >> >> Detonating high yield bombs at high altitude gives you some really     

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for tsu rockets in sci.military.naval
Author: Michael Shirley
Date: Aug 3, 2008 17:09

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:47:49 -0700, Andre Ilausky <ai_news@arcor.de> wrote: Michael Shirley schrieb: What size would this have to be for burning to take place? The Ballistics Research Lab at Aberdeen Arsenal considered an RPG-7V to be an overmatch for a Bradley, if that's any guide. <http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/m2-specs.htm> Armor Protection
Show full article (1.86Kb) · Show article thread
On Jul 20, 10:32 pm, "Michael Shirley" <mi5ke...@att.net> wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:57:51 -0700, Andre Ilausky <ai_n...@arcor.de> wrote: > > Paul J. Adam schrieb: > > >>>> The bulk Al will melt, not burn, and you have to get it very hot to > >>>> do so (the only practical difference is you may get a silvery puddle > >>>> instead of a blackened steel husk once the flames die out) but     

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for tsu rockets in sci.military.naval
Author: Michael Shirley
Date: Jul 22, 2008 12:06

On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 11:54:39 -0700, Juergen Nieveler <juergen.nieveler.nospam@arcor.de> wrote: "Michael Shirley" <mi5ke562@att.net> wrote: More than enough to do some close-up shots of beach defenses, for example, or pirate hideouts in Somalia For a low tech enemy, that might work. But even the Chinese these days are buying sub hunters. They're buying a variant
Show full article (2.30Kb) · Show article thread
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 13:57:51 -0700, Andre Ilausky <ai_news@arcor.de> wrote: > Paul J. Adam schrieb: > >>>> The bulk Al will melt, not burn, and you have to get it very hot to >>>> do so (the only practical difference is you may get a silvery puddle >>>> instead of a blackened steel husk once the flames die out) but there >>>> was definite concern about the behind-armour effects of     

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for tsu rockets in sci.military.naval
Author: Jack Linthicum
Date: Jul 21, 2008 04:15

On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:03:54 -0700, <dumpster4@hotmail.com> wrote: On Jul 17, 12:01 pm, "Michael Shirley" <mi5ke...@att.net> wrote: On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:02:35 -0700, <dumpst...@hotmail.com> wrote: Weren't Spartan and Sprint nuclear-tipped? Even without a salvage-fused target, wouldn't the normal ABM warhead detonation have caused similar effects?
Show full article (3.39Kb) · Show article thread
On Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:46:37 -0700, Richard Casady <richardcasady@earthlink.net> wrote: >> Yup, but I don't think that it got into service. Every one I've >> ever seen or got pics of is a 155mm variant. > > Don't forget that this so called nuke has a ten ton yield. Good trick > that. The guy who designed it, Ted Thompson, was a genius. He and Stan Ulam were the guys who came up with     

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for tsu rockets in sci.military.naval
Author: Michael Shirley
Date: Jul 20, 2008 19:50

On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:08:22 -0700, Keith Willshaw <keithnospam@demon.co.uk> wrote: "Michael Shirley" <mi5ke562@att.net> wrote in message news:op.udvqu5d3ra3qj7@schooner-blue... On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 08:26:11 -0700, Derek Lyons <fairwater@gmail.com> wrote: The problem comes of course with the rather large fraction of the time when nukes aren't on the table.
Show full article (2.70Kb) · Show article thread
On Jun 26, 6:34 am, El Castor <No_...@Here.Com> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:39:41 GMT, jim <jim10...@gmail.com> wrote: > >[Default] On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:46:13 -0700, El Castor > ><No_...@Here.Com> wrote: > > >>On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:06:41 GMT, jim <jim10...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>[Default] On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:06:25 -0700, El Castor > >>><No_...@Here.Com> wrote: > > >>>>On Tue,     

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for tsu rockets in sci.military.naval
Author: Michael Shirley
Date: Jul 20, 2008 19:32

On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:39:41 GMT, jim <jim10293@gmail.com> wrote: [Default] On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 23:46:13 -0700, El Castor <No_One@Here.Com> wrote: On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:06:41 GMT, jim <jim10293@gmail.com> wrote: [Default] On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:06:25 -0700, El Castor <No_One@Here.Com> wrote: On Tue, 24 Jun 2008 19:00:05 -0500, Billy J Maxwell <billymaxwell@notehere
Show full article (2.19Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for tsu rockets in sci.military.naval
Author: Michael Shirley
Date: Jul 19, 2008 14:17

Show full article (2.47Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for tsu rockets in sci.military.naval
Author: Michael Shirley
Date: Jul 10, 2008 14:15

Show full article (0.81Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for tsu rockets in sci.military.naval
Author: Michael Shirley
Date: Jul 7, 2008 01:50

Show full article (2.70Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.retirement · Group Profile · Search for tsu rockets in soc.retirement
Author: al Guacamole
Date: Jun 26, 2008 11:56

Show full article (8.65Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.retirement · Group Profile · Search for tsu rockets in soc.retirement
Author: El Castor
Date: Jun 26, 2008 09:34

Show full article (10.06Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · next