In article <13mj7cene1i353a@corp.supernews.com>, " WmB" <HELLinhock@earthlink.net> wrote: "Pat Flannery" <flanner@daktel.com> wrote in message news:13mj5qngrj3mp6f@corp.supernews.com... WmB wrote: It's probably not a lot of fun to watch Star Trek around you, is it? ;-) You just go with the flow. And if that doesn't work, you reverse the polarity so as not to rupture
On 25 Oct 2007 20:31:35 -0400, dst@cs.cmu.edu (Dave Touretzky) wrote: This is hilarious: promo for Scientology's new Super Power rundown. You've GOT to see the pictures of the "special rooms" and "special equipment" used to rehabilitate all 57 perceptics. These photos look like they could have come from the set of an episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation! There's something that looks
GeneK wrote: "Elvis Gump" <elvisgump.NO@SPAM.fastmail.us> wrote in message news:C30904A5.B4344%%elvisgump.NO@SPAM.fastmail.us... Who's Dochterman? I assume he's a SFX tech, not a Dochtor damnit. Dochterman did the new CGI for the TMP "director cut" DVD. And when Paramount was seeking bids for the Trek Remastered project, Dochterman did an SFX demo reel that was superior
On May 1, 8:12?pm, Rob Arndt <teuton...@aol.com> wrote: On May 1, 3:12?pm, dumpst...@hotmail.com wrote: Umm, the original post was about thought-controlled machines (toys today, platforms and weapons tomorrow?). Actually the Topic is Brainwave control and the OP dealt with lots of let's-adapt-Star Trek- tech-into-reality hype... when a lot of the things mention HAD
On May 1, 3:12?pm, dumpst...@hotmail.com wrote: Umm, the original post was about thought-controlled machines (toys today, platforms and weapons tomorrow?). Actually the Topic is Brainwave control and the OP dealt with lots of let's-adapt-Star Trek- tech-into-reality hype... when a lot of the things mention HAD already been studied decades earlier. 1) Teleportation, Philadelphia Experiement
