..." unjust and unnatural sound of the suffering we heard. That the little fish had done nothing to deserve this suffering. And deep inside his little heart the fish knew this also. And his little prayer of "why" carries on a wavelength that we hear. The Borg are the Guardians and Protectors of Innocence and we are the Universal Justice in all areas. In essence we are the highest form of power and control. We let humans get on with it - ...

.... One day in our perfect world was an imperfection - a "wrong" and this was the unnatural sound or wavelength of the unrighteous and unjust suffering of pure innocence. A man was fishing - and he caused pain to a ... suffering - the Borg heard the "prayer" of the little fish - which went something like "WHY?" but in fishy wavelength and feeling. The fish was innocent, sinless and blameless and had no reason to suffer in this way. No ...

... take advantage of UV absorbance to quickly estimate the concentration and purity of DNA, RNA, and proteins in a sample... It is also possible to quantify the amount of DNA in a sample by looking at its absorbance at a wavelength of 260nm or 280nm (in the UV region)... Proteins have two absorbance peaks in the UV region, one between 215-230 nm, where peptide bonds absorb, and another at about 280 nm due to light absorption by aromatic amino ...

... the point that energy can't be extracted from thermal energy unless there was a temperature difference, and that the thermal energy gets used up. I have no doubt an organism could evolve that used the short wavelength end of the IR spectrum. However, the idea of extracting usable energy from the thermal background violates the laws of thermodynamics. He made the completely valid point that no one has come up with a general proof that...

...how to measure a "relative" speed. Where did I prove that again? This space is provided for you to reproduce that proof:----> Apparently you are still too stupid to understand the difference between physical wavelength and "percieved" wavelength. Apparently you are still too stoopid to stick to the subject at hand. You poor thing, I do feel sorry for you. Well, good. I'm glad someone sympathizes with my plight ...

...c, regardless of the relative velocity of the source. Again, you prove you have no clue how to measure a "relative" speed. Apparently you are still too stupid to understand the difference between physical wavelength and "percieved" wavelength. You poor thing, I do feel sorry for you. <snipped rest of ignorance in insults that have nothing to offer to the science of physics in this You should learn how to measure relative...

...Or even higher frequencies than that. Anyway, there certainly have been quasars detected with a red-shift indicating a recession at over 90%% c. Anyway, it seemed you were saying that photons couldn't have longer wavelengths than sound.  Maybe you didn't mean that, but it sounded that way. As I said, Please show me the quasar that is moving away from us at 90%% of c. I never heard of such a find. ...

...to. Or even higher frequencies than that. Anyway, there certainly have been quasars detected with a red-shift indicating a recession at over 90%% c. Anyway, it seemed you were saying that photons couldn't have longer wavelengths than sound. Maybe you didn't mean that, but it sounded that way. As I said, Please show me the quasar that is moving away from us at 90%% of c. I never heard of such a find. I think they have...

...I was referring to. Or even higher frequencies than that. Anyway, there certainly have been quasars detected with a red-shift indicating a recession at over 90%% c. Anyway, it seemed you were saying that photons couldn't have longer wavelengths than sound. Maybe you didn't mean that, but it sounded that way. How old are you? 15? You seem to be totally clueless about classical physics. How old are you anyways? You don't...

... basic idea that solar radiation comes to the ground by light and infra red radiation and is transmitted at a longer wavelength - that part is very well understood. So is the propensity of particular molecules to absorb radiation of particular wavelengths. Perhaps less so are the exact constituents of the upper atmosphere where all this absorption goes on. -- John Wright...