...advice while taking this into account like I have to - I might get much better advice i think. Then stop posting to alt.magick altogether, and only post to aspie groups. If you keep posting to alt.magick, then stop complaining that we just don't understand. Otherwise, people will lose interest in wasting time and energy trying to help you here. I've met...

... that I'm actually here, it's plead and beg for me to go away. No, we're telling you to stop complaining about being the object of ridicule and laughter if you're in a flame group. :>This is Usenet and anything goes...Sarah has barged in all :>over in groups where SHE wasn't wanted but that never stopped her. So now you're the arbiter of alt* newsgroups? Hahahaha! :>She flamed me ...

... boar.  <sigh>   Y'know ... you had me going until you got to that part about the boar. I'll have you know that the neighbors 2 blocks away have STOPPED complaining about my snoring. 'sides Karen ... you are about 5' tall and weigh about 300 lbs. I doubt if you have slept with a man (four-legged males don't count) for the last ...

"Lou Ravi" <j.murphy@libertysurf.fr> wrote in message news:48b05e28$0$927$ba4acef3@news.orange.fr... Stop whining, stop talking bollocks, stop complaining and make some sensible suggestions. Otherwise you might as well fuck off. SWP tawk is that! -- Baroness Edwina Frogbucket

... real job in their lives. But, nevertheless, have no control whatsoever over how much salt you put on your chips. Stop whining, stop talking bollocks, stop complaining and make some sensible suggestions. Is it really your wish to destroy the fundamental reason for the existence of Usenet? Otherwise you might as well fuck off...

...bean munching professional politicans who've never done a real job in their lives. But, nevertheless, have no control whatsoever over how much salt you put on your chips. Stop whining, stop talking bollocks, stop complaining and make some sensible suggestions. Otherwise you might as well fuck off.

DavidR wrote: "Nick Finnigan" <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote I am not claiming 26%%, just not 0%%. Perhaps, but you have been wittering on rather a lot about the differences between the cars having something to do with the petrol. Only because you repeatedly asserted it was 0%%.

DavidR wrote: "John Wright" <john@pegasus.f2s.com> wrote DavidR wrote: In the link you sent, it says that the permitted SG range is between 0.72 to 0.775. Perhaps 10 or more years ago it was towards the top end whereas now it's closer to the lower limit. That unlikely possibility only gets us 8%%. Still a long way short of 26%%. http://www.world-petroleum.org/education/atfuels/index.html ...

"Nick Finnigan" <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote DavidR wrote: "Nick Finnigan" <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote DavidR wrote: "Nick Finnigan" <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote DavidR wrote: "Nick Finnigan" <nix@genie.co.uk> wrote No, there is a difference between gallons of petrol and amount of CO2 You have yet to explain this. The mass of carbon per gallon of petrol is not fixed. There are no ...

"John Wright" <john@pegasus.f2s.com> wrote DavidR wrote: In the link you sent, it says that the permitted SG range is between 0.72 to 0.775. Perhaps 10 or more years ago it was towards the top end whereas now it's closer to the lower limit. That unlikely possibility only gets us 8%%. Still a long way short of 26%%. http://www.world-petroleum.org/education/atfuels/index.html tells us that carbon ...