... is some hope for more. Look up Jampolsky, "Change your mind, change your life". From what I can tell, he thinks the ancient Stoic principle that you can improve you mind, is, in fact, true. And the Stoics were correct, in that it requires both physical and mental exercise. But Jampolsky draws in the brain scans, biochemistry of the mind, and ...

...war to attack those who they think have the wrong sacred text or name of god. "Change your mind, Change Your Life" is one of the books reporting on new neurological data and FMRI brain mapping. The Stoics were right; the mind is like a muscle, and the right kind of diet and exercise can make it more effective. But lets start with the realization that the modern diet is deficient in real nutrition and contaminate with...

... a nuclear war to attack those who they think have the wrong sacred text or name of god. "Change your mind, Change Your Life" is one of the books reporting on new neurological data and FMRI brain mapping. The Stoics were right; the mind is like a muscle, and the right kind of diet and exercise can make it more effective. But lets start with the realization that the modern diet is deficient in real nutrition and contaminate with ...

...@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... | http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080903/lf_afp/russiahistoryculturearchaeology_080903160809 | | Pistacjusz Wielka mi sztuka, ( PHI ! ) ale DLA was to bedzie pewnie wielkie odkrycie.. jak zapodam, ze zydowie i IZRAEL ma wiele stoic, ze wymienie: : New Yorkusalem, Budapeszt, Warszawa, Londyn... ( te najbardziej znane) a takze te najblizsze sercu kazdego Polaka: Thibisi...Kijew i Hujbyszew Kol

... it is; ED is really simple. You might try RED; sounds like it might be up your alley. I haven't used it (and the editor I thought I would find when googling for RED was something else entirely). It's written in STOIC. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_(text_editor) The RED I was looking for was printed as source code in one of the computer magazines in the early '80s. A friend of mine typed it in and used it for quite a while. I ...

...>> > for settling it. It would do no good of each side simply to assert its position without argument. So how would a standard of knowledge (or "criterion of truth," in the language of the Stoics) be defended? It could only be defended by reference to some standard or other. If the standard under dispute is invoked, then the question has been begged. If another standard is appealed to, the question arises...

... for settling it. It would do no good of each side simply to assert its position without argument. So how would a standard of knowledge (or "criterion of truth," in the language of the Stoics) be defended? It could only be defended by reference to some standard or other. If the standard under dispute is invoked, then the question has been begged. If another standard is appealed to, the question arises ...

...some means for settling it. It would do no good of each side simply to assert its position without argument. So how would a standard of knowledge (or "criterion of truth," in the language of the Stoics) be defended? It could only be defended by reference to some standard or other. If the standard under dispute is invoked, then the question has been begged. If another standard is appealed to, the question arises again...

... be some means for settling it. It would do no good of each side simply to assert its position without argument. So how would a standard of knowledge (or "criterion of truth," in the language of the Stoics) be defended? It could only be defended by reference to some standard or other. If the standard under dispute is invoked, then the question has been begged. If another standard is appealed to, the question arises again, ...

... must be some means for settling it. It would do no good of each side simply to assert its position without argument. So how would a standard of knowledge (or "criterion of truth," in the language of the Stoics) be defended? It could only be defended by reference to some standard or other. If the standard under dispute is invoked, then the question has been begged. If another standard is appealed to, the question arises again, to be ...