...; they differ in the experiential consequences they are postulated to have. It would give us some clues about how to go about modeling the experience of nonlinguistic creatures biologically similar to ourselves, e.g., humans who somehow develop to maturity in a non-social situation and never learn a language. If that's of interest to you then go right ahead. Meanwhile, I stick with my original comments: We may ...

... Someone breaks the law, she's arrested. The law will take its course. Nothing new there, then. Not forgetting the fact that cycles on pavements are also responsible for death and injury. Somehow, you conveniently forget to mention those cases. Yes but cars are much more damaging and lethal. I have no doubt that after this killer has been punished she will once again be allowed to drive. ...

... could not be found yet."44 Yet the hopelessly doomed scenarios of the evolutionists are not over yet. There still remains the problem of making these creatures fly! Since evolutionists believe that birds must somehow have been evolved, they assert that they were transformed from reptiles. However, none of the distinct mechanisms of birds, which have a completely different structure from land-dwelling animals, can be explained by gradual...

...which is lost if Emacs crashes. All this, however, is no reason to remove the scratch buffer. I can see it defaulting to fundamental-mode, not having that message in it, and prompting if modified and killed. But somehow I feel your proposed fix doesn't fit your initial demand (removing the scratch buffer). The scratch buffer itself isn't a usability problem. It's limitations are. So, if anything, you're improving the scratch buffer ...

... as you usually do, with this one. Or was it the mum's fault for allowing her baby to get in the way of the 4x4? Can you please point me to ONE, just one, instance of anybody here doing anything other than condemning utterly fuckwits such as this pissed cretin? Or even claiming that all drivers are somehow blameless? There's only one person round here who allocates blame according to the mode of transport, regardless of the facts.

... is his story and he's sticking to it. :-) That's your story, but remember you don't, nor will you, represent me. Publius makes a problem by saying labour is a term used when people had horses and buggies. Somehow (we're not told how) this is bad. Publius sticks to that ubiquitous textbook known as the internet for his sources. Perhaps if he gets a better job maybe he'll be able to go to college and actually study economics. Hint: ...

.... Conditions inside the US prison system are absolutely criminal. What I don't understand is why you'd wish absolution upon people who rape inside that system-and why you'd claim that rape *outside* that system is somehow less harmful than such behavior inside it. It seems that you are saying that this particular criminal activity should be excused simply because of the environment where those crimes take place. If that's true, then there's...

...- along with your rudeness - and how all you wanted to do was to somehow prove that we we wrong and you were right. Did not matter what we ...a word unless they could prove that knew more - they knew better and could somehow prove that we were wrong. When all we wanted to do was end your ...happy None of you listened to a word except to tell us that we must somehow "know" that angels are silly women who eat bananas and play cards and that ...

...> And...? Someone breaks the law, she's arrested. The law will take its course. Nothing new there, then. Not forgetting the fact that cycles on pavements are also responsible for death and injury. Somehow, you conveniently forget to mention those cases. Yes but cars are much more damaging and lethal. I have no doubt that after this killer has been punished she will once again be allowed to drive. Here's...

...And...? Someone breaks the law, she's arrested. The law will take its course. Nothing new there, then. Not forgetting the fact that cycles on pavements are also responsible for death and injury. Somehow, you conveniently forget to mention those cases. Yes but cars are much more damaging and lethal. I have no doubt that after this killer has been punished she will once again be allowed to drive. Not keen on...