... of RPA that would bring unity to Hmong along dialect lines. abstractly, it's a system that is dialect agnostic. (3) Though, RPA is simpler, cause of disunity disqualifies RPA as a viable choice i did not say RPA is "simpler". i said, many critics of other hmong writing systems have argued that RPA is more simple. you have read my words and txaj xab's ...

... understood the premises of your argument correctly: (1) The RPA system causes Hmong disunity (for example, Hmoob Dawb and Moob Lees) (2) A non-RPA system would bring unity to Hmong (3) Though, RPA is simpler, cause of disunity disqualifies RPA as a viable choice Logically, a rational answer would require proof of truth or falsehood for each premise. Therefore, one must ask the following questions: (1) Does the RPA system ...

... along dialect lines. Zhen, Let's see if I have understood your premises correctly: (1) RPA is responsible for disunity among Hmong (2) A non-RPA would bring unity to Hmong (3) Though, RPA is simpler, cause for disunity should disqualify RPA Thus, these premises need to be proven as being true of false. (1) Is RPA responsible for Hmong disunity, true or false? Answer: Even if RPA does not exist, ...

... <mmei...@googlemail.com> wrote: Zhen, Let's see if I have understood your premises correctly: (1) RPA is responsible for disunity among Hmong (2) A non-RPA would bring unity to Hmong (3) Though, RPA is simpler, cause for disunity should disqualify RPA Thus, these premises need to be proven as being true of false. (1) Is RPA responsible for Hmong disunity, true or false? Answer: Even if RPA does not exist, Hmong disunity ...

... are a lot more things that aren't allowed than that are. It is a special category of syntax all on its own rather than being a subset of a more general category such as initialization expressions. I'd think it simpler to keep track of what is allowed rather than with what isn't, except that... As it hasn't been mentioned yet, be sure that you really do want a DATA statement. Note that on most systems all the initializing data ...

On Sep 19, 9:55 am, John Passaniti <n...@JapanIsShinto.com> wrote: Jean-François Michaud wrote: A simpler approach is to simply store the entire block while tying a version number to it. Pulling the version is as simple as looking up the associated pairs (version and block). This is simple to implement but will rapidly become bulky space-wise; check-in/check-out is necessary here as well. The same "multi" function ...

... fact, there are a lot more things that aren't allowed than that are. It is a special category of syntax all on its own rather than being a subset of a more general category such as initialization expressions. I'd think it simpler to keep track of what is allowed rather than with what isn't, except that... I'd find it simplest to not keep track at all. For f90 and later (which is to say for anything today), I far prefer using initializers...

Jean-François Michaud wrote: A simpler approach is to simply store the entire block while tying a version number to it. Pulling the version is as simple as looking up the associated pairs (version and block). This is simple to implement but will rapidly become bulky space-wise; check-in/check-out is necessary here as well. The same "multi" function applies under the bulky solution. Rollback is the same as previously mentioned ...

..." function to pull all version X for a set of blocks is built on top of the function that allows you to pull a specific version. Rollback is just a question of deleting the deltas post a certain version. A simpler approach is to simply store the entire block while tying a version number to it. Pulling the version is as simple as looking up the associated pairs (version and block). This is simple to implement but will rapidly become bulky...

... the code, so it is natural to provide the scratch buffer to enable and encourage this. Imagine in NewEmacs, it also extending user's mindset exactly like emacs, except it's even more easier to use, faster to execute, simpler to operate, while having no comparative disadvantage. Emacs does not provide a user level function to create a new buffer. It has just New, which actually creates a empty file. Most apps's New ...