...> > > endurance, perdurance in philosophy and logic are incorrect. I would be interested to hear your comments, whether you see flaws in its argument or what the extensions of it may be. Sigmund. Extensions are pointing to flaws. Like JJ said, it was clay all the time, but it's changing properties (attributes). Sure, but a statue can be repaired when it ...

... endurance, perdurance in philosophy and logic are incorrect. I would be interested to hear your comments, whether you see flaws in its argument or what the extensions of it may be. Sigmund. Extensions are pointing to flaws. Like JJ said, it was clay all the time, but it's changing properties (attributes). Sure, but a statue can be repaired when it becomes damaged ...

... endurance, perdurance in philosophy and logic are incorrect. I would be interested to hear your comments, whether you see flaws in its argument or what the extensions of it may be. Sigmund. Extensions are pointing to flaws. Like JJ said, it was clay all the time, but it's changing properties (attributes). Sure, but a statue can be repaired when it becomes damaged resulting...

... objects, endurance, perdurance in philosophy and logic are incorrect. I would be interested to hear your comments, whether you see flaws in its argument or what the extensions of it may be. Sigmund. Extensions are pointing to flaws. Like JJ said, it was clay all the time, but it's changing properties (attributes). Sure, but a statue can be repaired when it becomes damaged resulting in ...

... of objects, endurance, perdurance in philosophy and logic are incorrect. I would be interested to hear your comments, whether you see flaws in its argument or what the extensions of it may be. Sigmund. Extensions are pointing to flaws. Like JJ said, it was clay all the time, but it's changing properties (attributes). Sure, but a statue can be repaired when it becomes damaged resulting in the ...

... of objects, endurance, perdurance in philosophy and logic are incorrect. I would be interested to hear your comments, whether you see flaws in its argument or what the extensions of it may be. Sigmund. Extensions are pointing to flaws. Like JJ said, it was clay all the time, but it's changing properties (attributes). Sure, but a statue can be repaired when it becomes damaged resulting in the ...

..., but the "pitcher of milk" would be gone. Because the milk was there originally, the "milk" and "pitcher of milk" must have been different things given that one has survived while the other has not. Regards, Sigmund. Siggy, your response indicates that you are are assuming that if there's a noun for it, it must be a thing. IOW, the 6th grade concept of "noun" is misleading you. Think "referents" instead of "things", and the ...

... around, so that the world does in fact exist even when you and me aren't there to "impose a context." Very interesting. I think there might be a view point similar to that, conceiving "God" as that which all these contexts are imposed onto. Regards, Sigmund. George Berkeley's book is available on Gutenberg. Download it and read it. It's quite short. http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/4723 HTH -- Wolf Kirchmeir

... pitcher of milk" and "milk" on the table without changing anything about their placement/orientation. Well, I guess you could analagously pour the pitcher's contents into a bottle. Then the same milk would be on the table, but the "pitcher of milk" would be gone. Because the milk was there originally, the "milk" and "pitcher of milk" must have been different things given that one has survived while the other has not. Regards, Sigmund.

...there wouldn't be a thing there at all! A) Exactly. Nice riff on George Berkely. He posited God as the Someone who is always around, so that the world does in fact exist even when you and me aren't there to "impose a context." Very interesting. I think there might be a view point similar to that, conceiving "God" as that which all these contexts are imposed onto. Regards, Sigmund. HTH -- Wolf Kirchmeir