... constant rivalry, each rush to assist where government aid is vital. Consider Katrina, or the Galveston-Houston devastation today. Consider how the world looks to America to lead, whether against Milosevic, or against Saddam, or against international terrorism. After WWI, Europe turned to American generosity to feed them, following the ruination of Europe in the wake of the war. After World War II our goodness received a...

...their constant rivalry, each rush to assist where government aid is vital. Consider Katrina, or the Galveston-Houston devastation today. Consider how the world looks to America to lead, whether against Milosevic, or against Saddam, or against international terrorism. After WWI, Europe turned to American generosity to feed them, following the ruination of Europe in the wake of the war. After World War II our goodness received a dramatic ...

... nice and negotiating with them, with or without pre-conditions. It didn't work with Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, or Saddam. It won't work with Ahmadinejad (bitch to spell, isn't it .. I like Leno's Ah-ma-... point about military sales). I wonder of a number of MOABs (Mother of All Bombs) are included. Israel ended Saddam's nuclear dreams by a pre-emptive strike on his single site that was relatively exposed. Nutjob learned a lesson ...

... lies to post quotes of everyone outside of the W administration who claimed Saddam had WMDs, including Clinton. In fact, Clinton made it clear and unequivocal, ... thought everyone agreed on that issue. But was the real point that Saddam might have some WWI era poison gas weapons still stockpiled? Certainly the ... a political risk. It was said by one of his associates that Saddam did not expect the US to carry through on the threat to ...

... would be better served without their partisan enthusiasm and exaggerated claims of just what was going on, which only setup straw men for the debunkers, which makes it look like they have a case. 911 was a lie. Saddam's WMD was a lie. Al Qaeda, Abu Gharib, much higher oil prices, Enron, Worldcom, middle class bankruptcy and foreclosure, and now financial, stock, and commodities market volitility. 911 is just one part of a...

... would be better served without their partisan enthusiasm and exaggerated claims of just what was going on, which only setup straw men for the debunkers, which makes it look like they have a case. 911 was a lie. Saddam's WMD was a lie. Al Qaeda, Abu Gharib, much higher oil prices, Enron, Worldcom, middle class bankruptcy and foreclosure, and now financial, stock, and commodities market volitility. 911 is just one part of a whole ...

... lies to post quotes of everyone outside of the W administration who claimed Saddam had WMDs, including Clinton. In fact, Clinton made it clear and unequivocal, ... thought everyone agreed on that issue. But was the real point that Saddam might have some WWI era poison gas weapons still stockpiled? Certainly the ... a political risk. It was said by one of his associates that Saddam did not expect the US to carry through on the threat to ...

..., September 16, 2008; A19 A GOP congressional leader who was wavering on giving President Bush the authority to wage war in late 2002 said Vice President Cheney misled him by saying that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had direct personal ties to al-Qaeda terrorists and was making rapid progress toward a suitcase nuclear weapon, according to a new book by Washington Post investigative reporter Barton Gellman. Cheney's assertions, ...

... them, at best, moot. Lorie Byrd compares it to "Al Gore speaking on global warming on a record breaking cold day, or Al Gore endorsing Howard Dean and his stance on the war just prior to the capture of Saddam Hussein." Here's a pretty decent rule of thumb: If someone is complaining about the "right-wing media bias," he or she is likely someone so far removed from reality that you would be wise to politely direct the conversation ...

...krytykowaliśmy na łamach Pardonu zaangażowanie Polski w iracką awanturę prezydenta Busha. Wywołaną, co dziś już wiemy na pewno, wskutek świadomego okłamania przez Waszyngton sojuszników i opinii publicznej co do zagrożeń, jakie Saddam szykował jakoby dla świata. Dziś wiadomo, że iracki dyktator nie miał ani broni masowej zagłady, ani związków z al-Kaidą. Jego brutalny reżim Amerykanie zastąpili nie demokracją, a krwawym chaosem, w kt...