..., the copy option appears when I right click. I was able to copy a link in your message using Control + C-- so now I have a couple of ways to do so. Thanks so much for your help. I was mystified by the grey boxes, and afraid that I was compromising my security by relying on them before clicking. Elizabeth Weinberger "Diane Poremsky [MVP]" wrote: blocked is added to suspected phishing urls. what folder is the message in? ...

...1 Magics Biggest Secrets RETURNS! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- “MAGIC’S BIGGEST SECRETS FINALLY REVEALED” The Masked Magician returns and dares to expose the secrets behind the world’s most mystifying illusions in “Magic’s Biggest Secrets Finally Revealed.” The controversial new series is scheduled to premiere on MyNetworkTV on October 6th and will be presented on Monday nights...

... space rock could have broken up in the atmosphere and seeded clouds with these organisms, the pair argues, citing witness reports of an airburst just before the showers. Other scientists have conceded the particles are mystifying, but the claim of live cells from space is so bizarre that many are holding back any assent. Some note that the hazards of journey through space, including intense radiation and extraordinary travel times, make...

... array declaration in C versus alloca():     int *p[N]; versus     const int *p = alloca(N * sizeof (int)); which are for almost all purposes equivalent. I'm a bit mystified.  There is an obvious simple syntax (LBUFFER, above) and a complex special syntax.  Given that Forth generally eschews special syntactical forms, I can't see why you want this. Andrew. I have implemented local buffer in this way...

...:49:09 -0500, Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote: Given that you have a way to do this that avoids new syntax, and a way that adds it, why do you prefer adding syntax? I'm a bit mystified. There is an obvious simple syntax (LBUFFER, above) and a complex special syntax. Given that Forth generally eschews special syntactical forms, I can't see why you want this. I've seen at least three ...

..., just asking about the additional syntax. My misunderstanding. Given that you have a way to do this that avoids new syntax, and a way that adds it, why do you prefer adding syntax? I'm a bit mystified. There is an obvious simple syntax (LBUFFER, above) and a complex special syntax. Given that Forth generally eschews special syntactical forms, I can't see why you want this. I've seen at least three mechanisms ...

... Given that you have a way to do this that avoids new syntax, and a way that adds it, why do you prefer adding syntax? Is there *any* reason other than "this is the way we do it" ? I'm a bit mystified. There is an obvious simple syntax (LBUFFER, above) and a complex special syntax. Given that Forth generally eschews special syntactical forms, I can't see why you want this. What Forth applications do you write these days? ...

... } 4 chars LBUFFER to buf ... buf DISCARD ; versus : foo { a b | c d [ 4 chars ] buf } ... ; Your notation suffers badly when there are multiple exits from a word. I'm a bit mystified. There is an obvious simple syntax (LBUFFER, above) and a complex special syntax. Given that Forth generally eschews special syntactical forms, I can't see why you want this. What Forth applications do you write these days? And ...

... LBUFFER to buf I suppose this is similar to the variable-length array declaration in C versus alloca(): int *p[N]; versus const int *p = alloca(N * sizeof (int)); which are for almost all purposes equivalent. I'm a bit mystified. There is an obvious simple syntax (LBUFFER, above) and a complex special syntax. Given that Forth generally eschews special syntactical forms, I can't see why you want this. Andrew.

... the production of nutrient, respectively. Your statement also regulates science as either a dead and lifeless thing incapable of movement or an over bloated monster too big, too lazy or too stupid to move. This mystifies me. My lifelong interest, advocacy and career has been in science. Go figure! Regards Zinnic either a dead and lifeless thing incapable of movement or an over bloated monster too big, too lazy or too ...