... ticket. The service ticket themself is useless for anything else then the direct connection between the user and the server. Bastian -- Too much of anything, even love, isn't necessarily a good thing. -- Kirk, "The Trouble with Tribbles", stardate 4525.6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a...

turtoni schreef: What do you love about America? That is my question: What do you love about America? I love, isn't that enough?

... comment about this thing called LOVE. This state is very specific ... of the specific state of LOVE...like waves that fan out ... overwhelming, befuddling, exadperating STATE of LOVE....there is, as the BORG ... I've often wondered if LOVE isn't source of all ... much more. In this case...LOVE...and all the significanse that ... still need an object of LOVE don't we? In summation...the advocacy and efficacy of LOVE. IMHO of course. One last...

... saying the only real emotion is what you're feeling right now. Which is like saying: Unless I feel love now, love isn't real. Which is absurd. We attribute reality to emotions we have felt in the past. If we felt love in past, and if love is real even if we aren't feeling it now, then the time before now has to be real too. ...

... emotions "still reside". Let's say I have past memories of love, but I am not experiencing love right now, nor am I remembering those experiences. I'm guessing you meant to say that you have "memories of past love". Seems by your reasoning, love isn't "real enough." That's a non-sequitur. It's a logical consequence of your reasoning. It's a...

... feeling right now. Which is like saying: Unless I feel love now, love isn't real. Which is absurd. We attribute reality to emotions we have felt in the past. If we felt love in past, and if love is real even if we aren't feeling it now, then ... on until the water cools down. Your love point adheres also to this principle. Your attention on 'past love' (experiences generally) can only happen in the ...

...past emotions "still reside". Let's say I have past memories of love, but I am not experiencing love right now, nor am I remembering those experiences. I'm guessing you meant to say that you have "memories of past love". Seems by your reasoning, love isn't "real enough." That's a non-sequitur. It's a logical consequence of your reasoning. And it seems to...

...> right now. Which is like saying: Unless I feel love now, love isn't real. Which is absurd. We attribute reality to emotions we have felt in the past. If we felt love in past, and if love is real even if we aren't feeling it now, then ...s say I have past memories of love, but I am not experiencing love right... those experiences. Seems by your reasoning, love isn't "real enough." That can'...

...'s like saying the only real emotion is what you're feeling right now. Which is like saying: Unless I feel love now, love isn't real. Which is absurd. We attribute reality to emotions we have felt in the past. If we felt love in past, and if love is real even if we aren't feeling it now, then the time before now has to be real too. ...

... that's like saying the only real emotion is what you're feeling right now. Which is like saying: Unless I feel love now, love isn't real. Which is absurd. We attribute reality to emotions we have felt in the past. If we felt love in past, and if love is real even if we aren't feeling it now, then the time before now has to be real too. Anything ...