AlfaMS wrote: Enzo Matrix schrieb: AlfaMS wrote: ..nicht schon wieder Robert Zimmerman.. :-( IMHO he is one of the most overrated artists of the last century - closely followed by TAFKAP, and Jacko.. I'm sorry, RJosef... I can't agree. I must admit that he's an acquired taste and probably best heard in small doses... but even so, he has been *incredibly* influential. Some people say that ...

Enzo Matrix schrieb: AlfaMS wrote: ..nicht schon wieder Robert Zimmerman.. :-( IMHO he is one of the most overrated artists of the last century - closely followed by TAFKAP, and Jacko.. I'm sorry, RJosef... I can't agree. I must admit that he's an acquired taste and probably best heard in small doses... but even so, he has been *incredibly* influential. Some people say that Dylan is best when covered ...

AlfaMS wrote: ..nicht schon wieder Robert Zimmerman.. :-( IMHO he is one of the most overrated artists of the last century - closely followed by TAFKAP, and Jacko.. I'm sorry, RJosef... I can't agree. I must admit that he's an acquired taste and probably best heard in small doses... but even so, he has been *incredibly* influential. Some people say that Dylan is best when covered by others. Well, covering Dylan songs ...

..nicht schon wieder Robert Zimmerman.. :-( IMHO he is one of the most overrated artists of the last century - closely followed by TAFKAP, and Jacko.. -- Josef

Op Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:37:28 -0700 (PDT) schreef jacko: <snip> I suggest you start from the top down and wite one ;-). But seriously algol on a pic? I'm sure top down is the perversion of bottom up, as all code is built up. Take sky scrapper example. I'm sure thedrawings were done very top down fashion due to the penthouse prices, but even though the cranes are top from bottom up today, the scrapper is most definately bottom ...

... you have a tool which 'handles' them ? I suggest you start from the top down and wite one ;-). But seriously algol on a pic? I'm sure top down is the perversion of bottom up, as all code is built up. Take sky scrapper example. I'm sure thedrawings were done very top down fashion due to the penthouse prices, but even though the cranes are top from bottom up today, the scrapper is most definately bottom up implemented. cheers jacko

jacko wrote: On 26 Aug, 08:23, Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/> wrote: Brad Eckert wrote: Guy Macon <http://www.GuyMacon.com/> wrote: Hmmm. Microsoft Viagra++ has a nice ring to it...... the well-known performance issues. There seems to be too much focus on how hard it is. A little more thought should be given to the end user experience ;-) cheers jacko And avoiding the Blue-Pill Screen of Death

...>I don't like hard languages. I work mostly with firmware... What really made the Microsoft Viagra++ project go limp was the customers.  They seemred to have a problem buying such a product from a company with "Micro" and "Soft" in the name.  That and the well-known performance issues. There seems to be too much focus on how hard it is. A little more thought should be given to the end user experience ;-) cheers jacko

On 18 Aug, 18:18, Brad Eckert <nospaambr...@tinyboot.com> wrote: On Aug 18, 9:04 am, jacko <jackokr...@gmail.com> wrote: Well in reality of budget constrants it's a CPLD with 1270 LEs, not a mega dollar fpga. Altera's online ... much more cost effective these days. Limited internal memory will favor Forth's shrewd use of resources for the next 10 years at least. Ya it is the main reason over C. cheers jacko

On Aug 18, 9:04 am, jacko <jackokr...@gmail.com> wrote: Well in reality of budget constrants it's a CPLD with 1270 LEs, not a mega dollar fpga. Altera's online store lists this CPLD at $22.70 for the cheapest one. Compare with $12.80 for the cheapest CycloneIII. Okay, you probably want a secure bitstream. Spartan3A has that covered with their "Device DNA" trick. Digikey lists the XC3S50A-4TQ144C at $10.02 and it boots from a ...