...utility (or lack of it) of the notion of "things in themselves." But styling some externals as "matters of linguistic convention" still fails to mark the discernible differences between classes of externals, and implies that the difference instead lies in that one class is a linguistic construct while others are not. All postulated externals are "linguistic constructs," and all are postulated to exist independently of the observer and...

... its wings and teeth in its mouth, but these traits do not imply that the creature bore any kind of relationship to reptiles. Besides, two...on its wings. Neither do the teeth in Archæopteryx's beak imply that it is a transitional form. Evolutionists make a purposeful trickery by...creature was not a transitional form. The overall anatomy of Archæopteryx imply stasis, not evolution. Paleontologist Robert Carroll has to admit that: The ...

... just ask for a list? Yes, he did, indeed. In the original posting. A hidden, an implicit list, this time, not his usual. explicit lists. But a posting with "greatest" in the subject still implies a list. His programming tricks are amazing. When can we expect linked lists? When can we expect an intelligent response from you? Intelligence and you don't meet in your postings. Good thing you ...

Obveeus wrote: "Martin Phipps" <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote: "You and Pailin both want this" she said, implying that she never really wanted to be in the race and was just going along with him because it was something he wanted to do. TAR Asia is so much harder than the US version. These people really have to work to complete these race legs. This episode was a real draining workout for the teams. If they keep...

... my arguments as opposed to the scientific - which is indeed religious and dogmatic in the absence of philosophical guidance. Those aren't "misgivings", they're direct contradiction of your beliefs. "Misgivings" implies partial acceptance, but with reservations. I have no misgivings regarding the evidence for speciation, nor that regarding evolutionary theory as the best current explanation of the relevant mechanism. ...

"Martin Phipps" <martinphipps2@yahoo.com> wrote: "You and Pailin both want this" she said, implying that she never really wanted to be in the race and was just going along with him because it was something he wanted to do. TAR Asia is so much harder than the US version. These people really have to work to complete these race legs. That being said, I think that one team failed to complete the final task of the leg and should ...

..., I'd expect it to still use sendmail.el; no point rewriting this. I'm not surprised it works wihtout cygwin, but it's good to know. For me, a cygwin option is easier in practice, but either is fine. Anyway, again, apologies for the implied rudeness of the last post; I am very grateful for the stuff on EmacsWiki; it was invaluable to me. It's probably going to form the basis of my email config for the next few years at least! Phil

Jean-François Michaud wrote: Are you looking for past strategies or current strategies (or both)? You context seems to imply you're interested in both but in each individual reference, you only want one or the other. I thought I was clear. I'm looking for *existing* strategies. Those can be from the past or currently in use.

... of all blocks captured at a particular point in time.  Whatever-- I'm just looking for past strategies. Are you looking for past strategies or current strategies (or both)? You context seems to imply you're interested in both but in each individual reference, you only want one or the other. Regards Jean-Francois Michaud In any case, modern versioning tools usually store the deltas of the modification instead of...

.....  It might only offer manual roll-back of a specific block to a prior state, or possibly a grand snapshot of all blocks captured at a particular point in time.  Whatever-- I'm just looking for past strategies. Are you looking for past strategies or current strategies (or both)? You context seems to imply you're interested in both but in each individual reference, you only want one or the other. Regards Jean-Francois Michaud