....net> wrote in message news:1wzAk.10610$Il.9573@newsfe09.iad... Regardless of any dictates the writers were given after the third season of "Voyager", there are very few episodes of the series where the lines/dialogue of "Janeway" could NOT be superimposed with those of "Kirk", who in the minds of many (mine at the forefront) is THE Captain by which all others are measured! Janeway was the closest "captain" we've ...

...@charter.net> wrote in message news:1wzAk.10610$Il.9573@newsfe09.iad... Regardless of any dictates the writers were given after the third season of "Voyager", there are very few episodes of the series where the lines/dialogue of "Janeway" could NOT be superimposed with those of "Kirk", who in the minds of many (mine at the forefront) is THE Captain by which all others are measured! Janeway was the closest "captain" we've ...

Zaroc Stone wrote: Rob Walker, author of a new book on consumer culture, explains how consumers embrace brands as part of their identities -- often without knowing it. So?????? -- not too random uselessnet weirdness: Bill Shatzer wrote: "And over 4,000 Americans have paid with their lives for that little adventure. Plus a half a trillion dollars in national treasure You might compare that with the number of lives ...

...>>>51 Documents seems to represent a renewed attempt by Brenner to bring information regarding Zionist collaboration with the Nazis to U.S. supporters of Israel, as well as to Jews and Muslims, in order to expand dialogue with knowledge, and save lives 'both Palestinian and Israeli' in the process. Readers of 51 Documents will find it difficult not to remove the rose colored glasses that so many seem to wear when examining...

Buying In: The Secret Dialogue Between What We Buy and Who We Are By Emily Wilson... identity. In his new book, Buying In: The Secret Dialogue Between What We Buy and Who We Are, Walker ...EW: In Buying In you write about the secret dialogue between marketers and consumers. How do you hope that dialogue might change after reading the book? RW: Well, what... two, your mind. I call it a secret dialogue because there's a lot going on there that ...

This is a hypothetical dialogue, between analyst and non-sheepish patient, purportedly one of many *forced* interviews, mandated by any of various authorities under any of various circumstances, too numerous to list each possibility: Psychiatrist to patient Joe: Please fill out this lengthy form Patient Joe: I don't fill out forms; I know all too well of your corruptions; if there's something you want to know, then ask me doc: What's your...

Dough wrote: Regardless of any dictates the writers were given after the third season of "Voyager", there are very few episodes of the series where the lines/dialogue of "Janeway" could NOT be superimposed with those of "Kirk", who in the minds of many (mine at the forefront) is THE Captain by which all others are measured! Janeway was the closest "captain" we've ever had to Kirk and, for that, I will be eternally grateful ...

... Christianity, God, Jesus, Satan, Genesis, etc. Waking up should be a struggle.:-) Spiritual evolution is at our core.Just make certain that spirituality is NEVRER confused with religiosity. Don't underestimate the power of self dialogue. You have been able to eliminate most of the dogmas that go with the course. Many spiritual masters (yes they do exist....but never ever believe that, or you will miss them) say that the process of self...

...<invalid@address.com> wrote in message news:EXEAk.529$T65.198@edtnps82... Regardless of any dictates the writers were given after the third season of "Voyager", there are very few episodes of the series where the lines/dialogue of "Janeway" could NOT be superimposed with those of "Kirk", who in the minds of many (mine at the forefront) is THE Captain by which all others are measured! Janeway was the closest "captain" we'...

... wrote: herbzet wrote: s.j.lagoe@googlemail.com wrote: On Sep 18, 1:57 pm, Josip Almasi <j...@vrspace.org> wrote: s.j.la...@googlemail.com wrote: [...] Below is a dialogue arguing that traditionals view of objects, endurance, perdurance in philosophy and logic are incorrect. I would be interested to hear your comments, whether you see flaws in its argument...