...not be able to significantly assert that any of those imagined entities "exist" (or are "real" or "actual") unless he can cite some truth conditions for those claims. If truth conditions can be cited for those claims then a *scientific* investigation may be pursued, and we move away from metaphysics. Yes. Metaphysics will have "run ...

... I hope that this is not a common misconception (it's certainly not a commonly held opinion on the erlang mailing list). If it is, let's clear things up. I wrote the following in a fairly well cited blog article on erlang-style concurrency: "There will always be limits. Erlang was designed for agent-style concurrency; not for massive data parallelism." (http://ulf.wiger.net/weblog/2008/02/06/what-is-erlang-style-...

... Saying what you say doesn't make it true. you fucking idiot, everyone of your bullshit claims has already been REFUTED.. Really cite that post.... in fact cite any post where you've specifically and directly refuted any point of fact raised by any other poster. All you do is call people stupid girls when they ...

...> Apropos.... Isn't the possibility of cross-compilation the reason some things are not allowed by the Fortran standard, while there is no "obvious" reason they should be disallowed? Yes, that reason has been cited in the past. However, it doesn't seem to be considered much of a problem any more, so some of those restrictions have been lifted. Cross compilation is still needed on occasion, but cross compilers today ...

mentifex@myuw.net wrote: http://mentifex.virtualentity.com/exhibit.html is guidelines for putting MindForth on display as artificial intelligence for science museums. Step 1: Write poster about AI winter Step 2: Cite mentifex and MindForth Step 3: Profit LOLZ.

... Apropos.... Isn't the possibility of cross-compilation the reason some things are not allowed by the Fortran standard, while there is no "obvious" reason they should be disallowed? Yes, that reason has been cited in the past. However, it doesn't seem to be considered much of a problem any more, so some of those restrictions have been lifted. Cross compilation is still needed on occasion, but cross compilers today generally have...

... I hope that this is not a common misconception (it's certainly not a commonly held opinion on the erlang mailing list). If it is, let's clear things up. I wrote the following in a fairly well cited blog article on erlang-style concurrency: "There will always be limits. Erlang was designed for agent-style concurrency; not for massive data parallelism." (http://ulf.wiger.net/weblog/2008/02/06/what-is-erlang-style-concurrency/) Also...

...>> Fuckin lie. We can have oil pumping in about 1.5 years. Are you really this misinformed? Cite? Or are you really this gullible? So you admit that you have absolutely no research skills and you want me ... national consumption anyway, and, Fuckin lie #2 Our untapped reserves are around 1.5 TRILLION barrels. Cite, again. You (whoever you are) saying it on usenet hardly makes it true. OTOH, if it is, I'd...

... it forth as. I doubt that. He was just trying to refute your "labor theory of value" by citing a counter example. You don't like meteroites? You want others? We can give you plenty of others. But its ...? What happened to scarcity doesn't exist? Now you are just being blatantly dishonest. I've cited many examples where scarcity applies, land just being one. Seats in a stadium is another. What characterizes them is ...

... Fuckin lie. We can have oil pumping in about 1.5 years. Are you really this misinformed? Cite? Or are you really this gullible? (B) our own untapped reserves simply aren't large enough to ... our national consumption anyway, and, Fuckin lie #2 Our untapped reserves are around 1.5 TRILLION barrels. Cite, again. You (whoever you are) saying it on usenet hardly makes it true. OTOH, if it is, I'd like...