the newcomer
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 71 articles for 0.448 sec
Joseph M. Newcomer wrote: > I had not spotted any memory leaks, so I'd like to know, so I can fix them. > joe Just all I did was compile the code and before and after the minor changes for the PeerInfo stuff and adding a simple echo logic, I used a simple TTY to connect and type away. 1) After the first 3-4 letters, there was an exception. I believe your explanation that it assumes     

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for the newcomer in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: Hector Santos
Date: May 14, 2010 00:40

Joseph M. Newcomer wrote: if (PeerInfo != "") return PeerInfo; // HLS FIX **** Try this: if(!PerrInfo.IsEmpty()) return PerrInfo; Note that it should be _T("") **** Too many letters to type to reach the same result. :) Plus, I like how it reads so that is what I use normally use in all languages I work with that offer Object based string with inherent operators
Show full article (3.31Kb) · Show article thread
See below... On Thu, 13 May 2010 15:22:04 -0700 (PDT), stephen park <steebu@gmail.com> wrote: >On May 13, 2:23 pm, Hector Santos <sant9...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Stephen, >> >> It does work. That is why I gave you other host names and ports to try >> it.  Its a simple "Dump Terminal" client application. >> >> Not sure what exactly you are looking for?  How to make Joe's code work? > >Yeah     

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for the newcomer in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: Hector Santos
Date: May 14, 2010 00:23

See below... On Thu, 13 May 2010 18:21:23 -0400, Hector Santos <sant9442@gmail.com> wrote: Ok, I downloaded and tested Joey's AsyncServer application. You're question is why you are seeing: ?.?.?.? [?] Closed Is that correct? The reason is that the socket is closed by the time the GetPeerPrefix() is called in DoClose() thus the socket peer binding information is already
Show full article (0.41Kb) · Show article thread
I had not spotted any memory leaks, so I'd like to know, so I can fix them. joe On Thu, 13 May 2010 19:06:24 -0400, Hector Santos <sant9442@gmail.com> wrote: >Joseph M. Newcomer wrote: > >> It also depends on what you are using for a protocol. Note that my example requires that >> each "message" start with a 4-byte binary length value which is the number of bytes in the >> packet, and     

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for the newcomer in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: Joseph M. Newcomer
Date: May 13, 2010 20:51

Joseph M. Newcomer wrote: It also depends on what you are using for a protocol. Note that my example requires that each "message" start with a 4-byte binary length value which is the number of bytes in the packet, and a telnet message would not conform to that protocol, so it depends on how much of my code you took to use. joe I downloaded the zip, unzipped it and loaded the
Show full article (5.30Kb) · Show article thread
It also depends on what you are using for a protocol. Note that my example requires that each "message" start with a 4-byte binary length value which is the number of bytes in the packet, and a telnet message would not conform to that protocol, so it depends on how much of my code you took to use. joe On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:53:14 -0700 (PDT), stephen park <steebu@gmail.com> wrote: >     

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for the newcomer in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: Joseph M. Newcomer
Date: May 13, 2010 20:32

On May 13, 2:23 pm, Hector Santos <sant9...@gmail.com> wrote: Stephen, It does work. That is why I gave you other host names and ports to try it.  Its a simple "Dump Terminal" client application. Not sure what exactly you are looking for?  How to make Joe's code work? Yeah, ok, I guess let me explain it this way. Assumption: The Newcomer server works. Meaning, I can send it
Show full article (5.03Kb) · Show article thread
Ok, I downloaded and tested Joey's AsyncServer application. You're question is why you are seeing: ?.?.?.? [?] Closed Is that correct? The reason is that the socket is closed by the time the GetPeerPrefix() is called in DoClose() thus the socket peer binding information is already invalid. Here is the fix based on the idea that the peer information does not change during the     

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for the newcomer in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: Joseph M. Newcomer
Date: May 13, 2010 20:29

Stephen, It does work. That is why I gave you other host names and ports to try it. Its a simple "Dump Terminal" client application. Not sure what exactly you are looking for? How to make Joe's code work? I will have try its code to explain whats going on. What I am trying to emphasis to you, is that don't get stuck with one trying to figure out a server is not working for you. Try
Show full article (1.20Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for the newcomer in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: Hector Santos
Date: May 13, 2010 16:06

Show full article (0.88Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for the newcomer in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: Joseph M. Newcomer
Date: May 13, 2010 15:39

Show full article (3.39Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for the newcomer in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: stephen park
Date: May 13, 2010 15:22

Show full article (2.94Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for the newcomer in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: Hector Santos
Date: May 13, 2010 15:21

Show full article (4.56Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: microsoft.public.vc.mfc · Group Profile · Search for the newcomer in microsoft.public.vc.mfc
Author: Hector Santos
Date: May 13, 2010 14:23

Show full article (3.72Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · next