rmjon: rofl. I'm always shocked by the reading of Leary as "magic" in the pejorative sense of "anti-science" (and conveniently simultaneously anti-religion.) Giordano Bruno is the perfect foil... another mass- professionally misunderstood philosopher who gets pigeonholed in convenient "other" blocks (I love the one where Bruno's mathematics is called "not nearly euclidean enough", by some early

i remember reading that part of book four was dictated to so-and-so (some soror) ... I've often wondered about how heavily edited this or that work by Crowley was (stylistically he has so much variation, but tends to be tightly constructing things yet off-the-cuff funny) ...was MiTP also just blurted out or was it composed over a longer period? if this is the case (composed all in "one sitting"

=ybegin part=4 line=128 size=768000 name=Trio.rar.106 =ypart begin=748801 end=768000 \)G¤ÝJt@²4áƜ¡Ì¯&à›Z«v–1àìÉQ$þ}UöÞuND2X6@,x¾ÍؽŽj_Ƴmµ@år1Õ}ó׃ßq=@9ž]d!Þ5ß«§‘W"¯¢r4DˆWLÏÑòºë¾˜X`vQmÌz1þ Ëv.nB«(-¿ë0]n4ŠX0Ík'YÀÊú®·PŒNçí×Zìޑ–HUI]{HUàÞuߎÇ#ó^UKé Ó¨­Ô%%+KD}x¦<å»,¹`þ‚‹e_h™þKr±&¢ tœ¸_Žž_ҝڟ—EÄx‹Oܽ‹~w€A+65 Tšð±+†ŒváèRÎK·g\1¾¼OHr×W§ 'š ­ÿíR±ˆC鐱#l†2W’