sociology note
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 2929 articles for 0.265 sec
In reality, the only contribution that science can make to the ideas of religion is atheism. And that, my friend is the way God planned it! ======================== Jim Prescott "I don't know who wrote the Book of Love, but I've got a pretty good idea why the pages stick together!!" HTTP://www.purehonk.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gadi Evron" <gevron@gmail.com> To: "Scientific     

Group: bit.listserv.skeptic · Group Profile · Search for sociology note in bit.listserv.skeptic
Author: Jim Prescott
Date: Aug 27, 2008 20:19

My beliefs are different from most folks on this mailing list, as while conscious of scientific thought and critical thinking, I am not a believer in being a non-believer. Still, this is interesting if not inspiring: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v454/n7208/full/4541049d.html We were perplexed by your Editorial on the work of the Templeton Foundation ('Templeton's legacy' Nature
Show full article (2.75Kb)
Dr. Henri Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 4 Aug 2008 05:46:51 -0700 (PDT), PD > <TheDraperFamily@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Aug 3, 5:57 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote: >>>> Just as a sociological note, I don't consider the knee-jerk >>>> contrariness of a couple of well-known goofballs (Spaceman and >>>> "Henri the Doctor Wilson") to constitute a controversy. There are >>>> certain people who,     

Group: bit.listserv.skeptic · Group Profile · Search for sociology note in bit.listserv.skeptic
Author: Gadi Evron
Date: Aug 27, 2008 18:50

On Aug 3, 5:57 pm, HW@....(Dr. Henri Wilson) wrote: On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 06:57:17 -0700 (PDT), PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote: On Jul 27, 4:18 pm, Uncle Ben <b...@greenba.com> wrote: It might seem strange to consider this plebian topic in a newsgroup having to do with such an esoteric subject at the theory of relativity, But, believe it or not, a controversy has arisen
Show full article (1.97Kb)
On Jul 27, 4:18 pm, Uncle Ben <b...@greenba.com> wrote: > It might seem strange to consider this plebian topic in a newsgroup > having to do with such an esoteric subject at the theory of > relativity, But, believe it or not, a controversy has arisen between > certain frequent posters in this newsgroup as to the result of > multiplying negative numbers, a topic generally treated in the U.S.     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for sociology note in sci.physics.relativity
Author: Spaceman
Date: Aug 4, 2008 15:55

Douglas McAdam wrote: How is the knowledge from "nowhere" acquired? ... and no there is knowledge that comes from "nowhere". Hi, Doug: To add to what I wrote before, the concept of the social construction of knowledge originated in Peter Berger's (phenomenological) sociology of knowledge. The basic idea is that knowledge originates through a process of intersubjectivity, which
Show full article (3.45Kb) · Show article thread
Dear Mark- This is one of those types of postings that I have a problem with and no offense to you but I don't think in terms of someone having the burden of proof. On one hand I read where scholars say science does not prove anything and on another I read where a scholar is saying "prove it when a conflicting opinion is met". I'm just saying Mark that I do not see any other way in which     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for sociology note in sci.physics.relativity
Author: PD
Date: Aug 4, 2008 05:46

Douglas McAdam wrote: Can you name for me any other way in which we learn in addition to Discovery, Experience and Revelation? Doug: Technically, you are shifting the burden of proof. If you believe that discovery, experience, and Revelation are the only ways in which we can learn, you would need to make a case for it. Nonetheless, I will name a category of learning which does not
Show full article (4.23Kb) · Show article thread
Hello DelusionalDimensionsRecoveryDDR, I didn't believe you at first, until I read mikey's reply. What a pathetic "dog abusin coward", as you say. It seems only "lyin dog abusin cowards" post here. I don't think I need to ask any dog behavior questions here. Thanks for the warning. Oh, and thank you for your FREE manual. Yours, Charley Sante, CleanEngineering KlysterEngineering@HotMail     

Group: sci.physics.relativity · Group Profile · Search for sociology note in sci.physics.relativity
Author: PD
Date: Jul 28, 2008 06:57

HOWEDY mikey aka pat aka unsurreality aka trollbasher you anonymHOWES pathetic miserable stinkin rotten lyin animal murderin child an spHOWES abusin punk thug coward active acute chronic long term incurable mental case and professional dog trainin FRAUD an SCAM ARTIST, <mdufort@rocksolidpos.com> wrote in message news:e41f7bc6-d41e-488f-88e5-05baa0c38b9e@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com... On
Show full article (1.96Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.religion.bahai · Group Profile · Search for sociology note in soc.religion.bahai
Author: Poststructuralist
Date: Jul 26, 2008 17:10

Show full article (1.51Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.religion.bahai · Group Profile · Search for sociology note in soc.religion.bahai
Author: Douglas McAdam
Date: Jul 25, 2008 20:40

Show full article (2.23Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.religion.bahai · Group Profile · Search for sociology note in soc.religion.bahai
Author: Poststructuralist
Date: Jul 25, 2008 15:14

Show full article (1.49Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.support.grief.petloss · Group Profile · Search for sociology note in alt.support.grief.petloss
Author: Charley Sante
Date: Jun 25, 2008 16:21

Show full article (29.53Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.support.grief.petloss · Group Profile · Search for sociology note in alt.support.grief.petloss
Author: DelusionalDimensionsRecoveryDDR
Date: Jun 25, 2008 14:55

Show full article (27.96Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next