relationshps
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 128 articles for 0.303 sec
In microsoft.public.money, Ian wrote: > > >"Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: > >> In microsoft.public.money, Cal Learner-- MVP wrote: >> >> >In microsoft.public.money, Ian wrote: >> > >> >>Hi, all - I believe the following relationship should be correct and yet I >> >>cannot get it to balance. What am I missing? >> >> >> >>Between 2 specific dates...(Change in market value of portfolio)     

Group: microsoft.public.money · Group Profile · Search for relationshps in microsoft.public.money
Author: Cal Learner-- MVP
Date: Sep 22, 2008 16:51

"Cal Learner-- MVP" wrote: In microsoft.public.money, Cal Learner-- MVP wrote: In microsoft.public.money, Ian wrote: Hi, all - I believe the following relationship should be correct and yet I cannot get it to balance. What am I missing? Between 2 specific dates...(Change in market value of portfolio) + (cash flow) = (change in net worth)
Show full article (1.15Kb) · Show article thread
"Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in news:6ioh4sFrisrfU1@mid.individual.net: > > "Peter Fichera" <pgf_666@yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:Xns9B14333D33060pgfipeoplepccom@216.196.97.131... >> "Alex W." <ingilt@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in >> news:6idc0aFq7fn2U1@mid.individual.net: >> >>> >>> "Peter Fichera" <pgf_666@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:Xns9B105385807pgfipeoplepccom@216     

Group: microsoft.public.money · Group Profile · Search for relationshps in microsoft.public.money
Author: Ian
Date: Sep 22, 2008 12:44

In article <5f5f8fa4-bfda-4200-a810-4673740d8385@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, tadas.blinda@lycos.es wrote: <deletions> Don't be a stooge of the Kremlin, saying "Saaka=9Avili must go". Think for yourself, read intelligent international articles, not Russian sources. He should read articles from various sources, including Russian ones. Just about everyone agrees that Russia
Show full article (0.84Kb) · Show article thread
Owen Jacobson wrote: > I actually prepared this for your ball-in-a-box example. > > Let's see if we can come up with the result predicted by conservation > of momentum without actually using it as a law. First, some > definitions, per high-school physics (no relativity here, only Sir > Isaac Newton and friends). > > Fundamentals: > > Time is a separation between two events; its units are     

Group: alt.agnosticism · Group Profile · Search for relationshps in alt.agnosticism
Author: Peter Fichera
Date: Sep 11, 2008 17:49

On Jul 22, 11:56 pm, "Spaceman" <space...@yourclockmalfunctioned.duh> wrote: Greg Neill wrote: Amazing.  James has discovered an infinite energy source and perpetual motion!  How could it be that 2000 years of tinkering with colliding masses has not produced one other person who has noticed this! See, Still no simple proof and just arrogant asshole bullshit twisting
Show full article (10.24Kb) · Show article thread
On Jun 19, 5:28 pm, "Michael Ventolo" <nowh...@oblivion.ca> wrote: > "Spleen Merchant" <waterboy1...@yahooo.com> wrote in message > > news:g3eb5q$ft3$1@aioe.org... > > > > > "kovy" <s...@happy.com> wrote in message > >news:485aadc7$0$5234$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com... > >> How great would it be if Dolan was forced to sell the team? > > > Not great. It would only cause trouble for     

Group: soc.culture.baltics · Group Profile · Search for relationshps in soc.culture.baltics
Author: Eugene Holman
Date: Aug 12, 2008 02:57

anonymous wrote: cyrus wrote: anonymous wrote: The Master wrote: On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, No One wrote: Marrage is NOT a state recognized religious act, it's a secular act recognized by religion. As such, religious views should play no part in the constitutionality of gay marrage, period. So, tell me... WITHOUT using religion, why should
Show full article (6.23Kb) · Show article thread
cyrus wrote: > > anonymous wrote: > > The Master wrote: > >> On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, No One wrote: > >> > >>>> Marrage is NOT a state recognized religious act, it's a secular act > >>>> recognized by religion. As such, religious views should play no part > >>>> in the constitutionality of gay marrage, period. > >>>> > >>>> So, tell me... WITHOUT using religion, why should gays not get married     

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for relationshps in sci.physics
Author: Spaceman
Date: Jul 22, 2008 23:27

LauraM wrote: On Jun 4, 1:02 am, anonymous <anonym...@anonymous.com> wrote: Rudy Canoza wrote: The Master wrote: On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, zero tolerance wrote: (06-02) 19:24 PDT Sacramento - -- A constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage in California was placed on the Nov. 4 ballot Monday, kick-starting an election struggle that
Show full article (11.93Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.physics · Group Profile · Search for relationshps in sci.physics
Author: Owen Jacobson
Date: Jul 22, 2008 23:08

Show full article (11.99Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.sports.hockey.nhl.nyrangers · Group Profile · Search for relationshps in alt.sports.hockey.nhl.nyrangers
Author: Blue Seat Viceroy
Date: Jun 19, 2008 20:32

Show full article (1.07Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.support.fatacceptance · Group Profile · Search for relationshps in soc.support.fatacceptance
Author: cyrus
Date: Jun 5, 2008 23:10

Show full article (6.36Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.support.fatacceptance · Group Profile · Search for relationshps in soc.support.fatacceptance
Author: anonymous
Date: Jun 4, 2008 19:17

Show full article (5.75Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.support.fatacceptance · Group Profile · Search for relationshps in soc.support.fatacceptance
Author: anonymous
Date: Jun 4, 2008 19:12

Show full article (2.69Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next