... 1956, 216). So far, you've produced nothing to show that Kant's position was any different. I quoted at length to you directly, ... positive source of information. </q> http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.philosophy/msg/f55efe54b309fec7?&hl=en&q=kant+webpage </q> Five lines later, liar. Simon Blackburn Originally quoted here by Robert Cohen, for whatever reason. ...
... begins with experience. Read the question he asks BEFORE he says ... begins with it" In that question he is clearly saying that ... because he says, in his question, that there are no objects ... experience." Even mortal says, that Kant says that time was not ... too fucking stupid to understand Kant, Plato, Hegel, Nietzsche... Why not...
...its own form of suckage. My interpretation is that Kant is trying to distinguish two questions, without the benefit of the current vocabulary (which...be unclear): origins and justification. Take the question: "Why do I have that money in the ...'s an important distinction. Confusing the two questions even has its own name, the Genetic Fallacy...
...knowledge begins with experience. Read the question he asks BEFORE he says ...but begins with it" In that question he is clearly saying that man...- because he says, in his question, that there are no objects to...of experience." Even mortal says, that Kant says that time was not derived...are too fucking stupid to understand Kant, Plato, Hegel, Nietzsche... Why not ...
...my normal style: My interpretation is that Kant is trying to distinguish two questions, without the benefit of the current ...>>unclear): origins and justification. Take the question: "Why do I have that money in...contradictory. But if it's a question of cause or origin, the answer ... an important distinction. Confusing the two questions even has its own name, the...
...form of suckage. My interpretation is that Kant is trying to distinguish two questions, without the benefit of the current ...>unclear): origins and justification. Take the question: "Why do I have that money in...>contradictory. But if it's a question of cause or origin, the answer ... an important distinction. Confusing the two questions even has its own name, the ...
... mind, therefore space and time (entities and action of existence) are the primacy of man's knowledge and surely you would be hard pressed to argue otherwise. You don't understand Kant at all. In Kantianism, Both space and time are categories of the mind; like Reality, but different categories. That's fully compatible with two key tenets of Gordgianism: that entities do not exist ...
... are still being kept alive by personality cultism and not primarily the ideals involved. <quote> One could say the same thing about Rand, the difference is only one of scholarship. Kant scholars welcome as many interpretations as there are available, while Randroids "scholars" (ahem) welcome none but those "interpretations" generated by the ARI. . I see. Machan, ...
...my normal style: My interpretation is that Kant is trying to distinguish two questions, without the benefit of the current vocabulary...>unclear): origins and justification. Take the question: "Why do I have that money ...contradictory. But if it's a question of cause or origin, the answer ...an important distinction. Confusing the two questions even has its own name, the...
... last time I called you out on that. Yes, let's put that in, too: <quote> One could say the same thing about Rand, the difference is only one of scholarship. Kant scholars welcome as many interpretations as there are available, while Randroids "scholars" (ahem) welcome none but those "interpretations" generated by the ARI. . I see. Machan, Rasmussen, Den Uyl, ...
