|
|
 |
| found 59090 articles for 7.420 sec |
  |
Group: az.politics · Group Profile · Search for phoning it in in az.politics
Author: John Boner
Date: Jul 7, 2011 07:51
Awww, cuss. Companies used to pride themselves in giving service; now it's in giving charges. Where will it end? Copyright the Sun, charge for air. Like COMMUNISM, CAPITALISM HAS NO COUNTRY: Verizon PRETENDS phone data COSTS them more. Be sure to let the government tax you to give Big Business Tax Breaks because despite a Corporation being considered a legal fictitious "person," they have
|
| Show full article (5.50Kb) |
Group: houston.politics · Group Profile · Search for phoning it in in houston.politics
Author: John Boner
Date: Jul 7, 2011 07:51
On 08 Jun 2010 11:50:28 +0100 (BST) Theo Markettos <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote: It really means that it isn't tied to using a particular SIM, It's very rare to have a phone locked to a particular SIM. Many years ago there were some Philips Cellnet PAYG phones that did that, but for the vast majority where the SP lock (it means Subsidy Protection BTW) is set then it simply
|
| Show full article (5.50Kb) |
|
Group: dfw.politics · Group Profile · Search for phoning it in in dfw.politics
Author: John Boner
Date: Jul 7, 2011 07:51
In message <T9nPn.28594$hP7.3920@hurricane>, at 09:27:30 on Tue, 8 Jun 2010, Linda Fox <linda.ff@ntlworld.com> remarked: I _suspect_ that the use of the word "free" in the context of SIM free - that is, as part of the product "title" - is an anomaly, in that it means "lacking and needed". Can you think of any similar use of the word? What it means is "this phone does not come with a tie
|
| Show full article (5.50Kb) |
|
|
|
1 ·
2 ·
3 ·
4 ·
5 ·
6 ·
7 ·
8 ·
9 ·
next |
|
|
