not that kind of penetration
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 10849 articles for 1.582 sec
Dear Rowland Croucher, Thank you for sharing this beautiful article. Hope many will ready and understand how easily they can be cheated. Let work for the TRUTH. Cheers On Nov 16, 3:53 pm, **Rowland Croucher** <rccrouc...@pleasedeletethisoptusnet.com.au> wrote: > Divisions In Our World Are Not > The Result Of Religion > > By Karen Armstrong & Andrea Bistrich > > 14 November, 2007     

Group: alt.religion.christian.romancatholic · Group Profile · Search for not that kind of penetration in alt.religion.christian.romancatholic
Author: arah
Date: Nov 16, 2007 00:17

Divisions In Our World Are Not The Result Of Religion By Karen Armstrong & Andrea Bistrich 14 November, 2007 Countercurrents.org Karen Armstrong was a Catholic nun for seven years before leaving her order and going to Oxford. Today, she is amongst the most renowned theologians and has written numerous bestsellers on the great religions and their founders. She is one of the 18 leading
Show full article (22.99Kb) · Show article thread
"Just plain "Dusty"" <RV_phixer@innerREMOVETHISlodge.com> wrote in message news:12uj5uu8cgonca@news.supernews.com... > The insipidly dim webby, "Don Lampson" <DonLampson@webtv.net> wrote in > message news:21075-45E8ED38-853@storefull-3137.bay.webtv.net... >> Dusty >> Why would you think getting shot while wearing body armor would knock >> anyone down? >> It sounds like you got your "warrior     

Group: alt.religion.christian.romancatholic · Group Profile · Search for not that kind of penetration in alt.religion.christian.romancatholic
Author: **Rowland Croucher**
Date: Nov 15, 2007 23:53

The insipidly dim webby, "Don Lampson" <DonLampson@webtv.net> wrote in message news:21075-45E8ED38-853@storefull-3137.bay.webtv.net... Dusty Why would you think getting shot while wearing body armor would knock anyone down? It sounds like you got your "warrior training" from watching "Dirty Harry" movies? HawHawHaw! No handgun is going to knock anybody down, except in a movie
Show full article (22.30Kb)
TT wrote: > Joe Ramirez wrote: >> On Jun 7, 5:45 pm, TT <n...@email.org> wrote: >>> kaennorsing wrote: >>>> On 7 jun, 19:11, TT <n...@email.org> wrote: >>>>> Joe Ramirez wrote: >>>>>> On Jun 7, 12:06 pm, TT <n...@email.org> wrote: >>>>>>> Wilander said that today the most aggressive player wins on clay - >>>>>>> Nadal... >>>>>> Soderling hit more winners than Nadal in the final, and was generally     

Group: rec.outdoors.rvtravel · Group Profile · Search for not that kind of penetration in rec.outdoors.rvtravel
Author: My Name Is Nobody
Date: Mar 3, 2007 15:19

Joe Ramirez wrote: On Jun 7, 5:45 pm, TT <n...@email.org> wrote: kaennorsing wrote: On 7 jun, 19:11, TT <n...@email.org> wrote: Joe Ramirez wrote: On Jun 7, 12:06 pm, TT <n...@email.org> wrote: Wilander said that today the most aggressive player wins on clay - Nadal... Soderling hit more winners than Nadal in the final, and was generally the one
Show full article (2.98Kb)
Homer wrote: >>> You're a clueless idiot. You sound like a mixture of Homer and High >>> Plains Hypocrite. > > Unlikely, since I would never support patents of any kind, and I > certainly wouldn't describe any kind of "evil" as necessary. > > You can whine all you like about companies "needing to protect" or > "needing to recover" their investments, but the fact is they have no > more "right"     

Group: rec.outdoors.rvtravel · Group Profile · Search for not that kind of penetration in rec.outdoors.rvtravel
Author: Just plain Dusty"
Date: Mar 3, 2007 07:44

Verily I say unto thee, that Phil Da Lick! spake thusly: Hadron wrote: justification for patetns in any given market are solely to advance the state of the art in the public domain. The protection that patents offer are *not* an incentive for a patent regime; they are a neccessary evil of the process. Software patents do not acheive the goal of advancing the state of the
Show full article (1.82Kb)
Demonic creatures etc. have NO PERMISSION to talk to me (rev 2.0) 7 December 2007 (Version 2.0 on 23 Apr 2008) ' Demonic creatures have NO permission to talk to or speak with me, unless specifically asked by me, and     

Group: rec.sport.tennis · Group Profile · Search for not that kind of penetration in rec.sport.tennis
Author: TT
Date: Jun 7, 2010 15:45

Demonic creatures etc. have NO PERMISSION to talk to me (rev 2.0) 7 December 2007 (Version 2.0 on 23 Apr 2008) ' Demonic creatures have NO permission to talk to or speak with me, unless specifically asked by me, and
Show full article (3.18Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: rec.sport.tennis · Group Profile · Search for not that kind of penetration in rec.sport.tennis
Author: TT
Date: Jun 7, 2010 15:43

Show full article (2.91Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.os.linux.advocacy · Group Profile · Search for not that kind of penetration in comp.os.linux.advocacy
Author: Phil Da Lick!
Date: Sep 22, 2008 13:40

Show full article (3.49Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: comp.os.linux.advocacy · Group Profile · Search for not that kind of penetration in comp.os.linux.advocacy
Author: Homer
Date: Sep 22, 2008 11:11

Show full article (2.83Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.religion.scientology · Group Profile · Search for not that kind of penetration in alt.religion.scientology
Author: Leonardo Been
Date: Sep 22, 2008 10:33

Show full article (5.33Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.conspiracy · Group Profile · Search for not that kind of penetration in alt.conspiracy
Author: Leonardo Been
Date: Sep 22, 2008 10:33

Show full article (5.33Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next