multi parters
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 21 articles for 0.389 sec
Duggy <Paul.Duggan@jcu.edu.au> wrote in news:28605901-18de-4afb-9129-c8ad4af9c522@h1g2000prh.googlegroups.com: > On Jul 18, 10:53 am, Billy Bissette <bai...@coastalnet.com> wrote: >> Duggy <Paul.Dug...@jcu.edu.au> wrote: >> > Yes, because the only people who watched Superman Returns, >> > Spiderman, Spiderman 2, Spiderman 3, Batman, Batman Begins, Batman >> > Returns, Superman: The Movie,     

Group: alt.tv.smallville · Group Profile · Search for multi parters in alt.tv.smallville
Author: Billy Bissette
Date: Jul 18, 2008 23:27

Leo wrote: I really liked Farscape. Really have to watch it in order though. At least, starting in second season, it begins to have an on-going plot. I like how its more morally grey than your standard sci-fi it is, even the good guys can be right bastards who betray their comrades, given the right set of circumstances and motivations. Watched the whole lot over a month last year
Show full article (2.11Kb) · Show article thread
I really liked Farscape. Really have to watch it in order though. At least, starting in second season, it begins to have an on-going plot. I like how its more morally grey than your standard sci-fi it is, even the good guys can be right bastards who betray their comrades, given the right set of circumstances and motivations. Never really got into the stargate series. I like sci-fi, so     

Group: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg · Group Profile · Search for multi parters in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg
Author: Nostromo
Date: Apr 10, 2008 21:40

On Nov 7, 5:41 am, sigidu...@yahoo.com wrote: Our front page: http://groups.google.com/group/soc.history.what-if/topics?lnk=lr It changes every time someone posts, of course. But looking at it this morning, I had to flinch a little. Out of 30 threads displayed, I count 6 commercial spams and 7 cross- posted conspiracy threads. (Most involving the Jeeeewwws, and with
Show full article (2.33Kb) · Show article thread
Ian Galbraith (me@privacy.net) wrote: : On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:19:08 +0000 (UTC), Brad Filippone wrote: : > Michael Bowker (mikeb@blueneptune.com) wrote: : [snip] : >: Many people prefer to end Buffy on the "She saved the World a lot" note : >: than to admit that Buffy continued and became bad. : And many people think S6 and 7 are amongst the best season of the show. : >: Anim is one     

Group: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg · Group Profile · Search for multi parters in comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg
Author: Leo
Date: Apr 10, 2008 14:40

Fred J. McCall wrote: "Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@attbi.com> wrote: :"Red Storm Rising" is an excellent novel, but never was made into a :movie. It was written in 1986, and most likely the dissolution of the :USSR in 1991 took away the incentive to make a movie out of it. "Red :Storm Rising" showed pretty graphically what a conventional WWIII :between NATO and Warsaw Pact forces
Show full article (1.31Kb) · Show article thread
"Alistair Davidson" <anarchoal@oohay.co.uk> wrote in message news:JboEg.443$7Q5.392@newsfe3-gui.ntli.net... <snip> > What happens to 2000AD in this TL? I imagine it still comes about (unless > we've butterflied away the 70s scifi movie boom), but does it have > multi-parters and as dark a world as Judge Dredd? > Agree, 2000AD is likely, there was a gap in the UK market for science fiction     

Group: soc.history.whatif · Group Profile · Search for multi parters in soc.history.whatif
Author: JBodi
Date: Nov 7, 2007 18:55

Midnighter wrote: "Stan Engel" <stan_engel@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:44e1f2a6$0$21050$88260bb3@free.teranews.com... > The X-Men were originally portrayed as stereotype super-heroes of the 60s with plenty of admiring fans. Purely good, they constantly battled Magneto and his Evil Brotherhood. Sales languished and somebody (Stan Lee probably) introduced the anti-mutant
Show full article (1.90Kb) · Show article thread
The Horny Goat wrote: [snip] > I post more mini-scenarios than Noel and I don't believe either > of us have ever done a serious multi-parter (god help me if I'm wrong > on this as the flamethrowers will certainly come out) I want to say this as gently as possible. You are so terribly, terribly wrong. Noel has been a brilliant contributor to FANTL. I am especially reminded of his     

Group: alt.tv.startrek.tos · Group Profile · Search for multi parters in alt.tv.startrek.tos
Author: Brad Filippone
Date: Jun 8, 2007 06:05

On 9 Aug 2006 10:55:09 -0700, "Coyu" <coyu@aol.com> wrote: Lyle Craver wrote: Bloody hell. There goes one of my better reasons for coming here. Are you familiar with the term 'enabler', Lyle? Let me harsh on your conduct here for a moment. You have a consistent pattern of providing trolls -- Mike Cleven, Matt Giwer, and now Phil McGregor -- respite from the otherwise unending
Show full article (2.35Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for multi parters in sci.military.naval
Author: David E. Powell
Date: Jan 7, 2007 18:06

Show full article (1.23Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.history.what-if · Group Profile · Search for multi parters in soc.history.what-if
Author: Stephen Copinger
Date: Aug 17, 2006 12:31

Show full article (1.62Kb)
    

Group: soc.history.what-if · Group Profile · Search for multi parters in soc.history.what-if
Author: Alistair Davidson
Date: Aug 15, 2006 11:16

Show full article (1.61Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: soc.history.what-if · Group Profile · Search for multi parters in soc.history.what-if
Author: Syd Webb
Date: Aug 10, 2006 04:36

Show full article (1.81Kb)
    

Group: soc.history.what-if · Group Profile · Search for multi parters in soc.history.what-if
Author: The Horny Goat
Date: Aug 9, 2006 17:13

Show full article (7.16Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · next