Wow! Thank you for the great and specific responses. Looks like I may be having a lot of fun next weekend. thanks, Bob e.lafave@hotmail.com wrote: On Aug 15, 1:43 pm, Bob Stark <bobby...@hotmail.com> wrote: Hey gang, I've been away from the group (for reasons I won't go into here, but ask me in private and I'll tell you) for a while and thought it was time to return
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:36:05 -0400, Pastor Dave wrote: On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:32:50 -0600, gatekeeper <gatekeeper.eastgate@hotmail.com> wrote: <Exclamation marks used for emphasis only and please note the smilies.> So how come you both say different things if you are both preterists? You seem to think that all preterist are in lock-step as far
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:32:50 -0600, gatekeeper <gatekeeper.eastgate@hotmail.com> wrote: <Exclamation marks used for emphasis only and please note the smilies.> So how come you both say different things if you are both preterists? You seem to think that all preterist are in lock-step as far as what they believe! Preterism, like Futurism is a technique of systematic
On 27 Oct 2007 03:49:04 -0700, Emma wrote: In article <17l4b9694xihm.1hgvxixrea73z.dlg@40tude.net>, gatekeeper says... Fact is, we have the scriptures to study to find out what they actually believed! Then our faith is based on the Word, where faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God! But if you give a group of people a bible, and ask for
In article <17l4b9694xihm.1hgvxixrea73z.dlg@40tude.net>, gatekeeper says... Fact is, we have the scriptures to study to find out what they actually believed! Then our faith is based on the Word, where faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the Word of God! But if you give a group of people a bible, and ask for their interpretations, they will all say different
