Howard Jaegermeister wrote: On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:14:24 -0500, Gary Scott wrote: James Giles wrote: I can't post to the j3mailinglist, but there are a couple of articles I'd like to respond to there. I hesitate to just post them here (though their context is clear, some members may...
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:14:24 -0500, Gary Scott wrote: James Giles wrote: I can't post to the j3mailinglist, but there are a couple of articles I'd like to respond to there. I hesitate to just post them here (though their context is clear, some members may regard it as unfair to publicize their internal ...
James Giles wrote: I can't post to the j3mailinglist, but there are a couple of articles I'd like to respond to there. I hesitate to just post them here (though their ... you know I'm laughing with you, not at you) Gary Scott is correct... and I doubt the j3 folks are that elitist (at least, I hope not). Or (more sinisterly) are you afraid of eventually ...
James Giles wrote: I can't post to the j3mailinglist, but there are a couple of articles I'd like to respond to there. I hesitate to just post them here (though their context is clear, some members may regard it as unfair to publicize their internal machinations). I have no need to post there the vast majority of the time. So I don't want to rock...
I can't post to the j3mailinglist, but there are a couple of articles I'd like to respond to there. I hesitate to just post them here (though their context is clear, some members may regard it as unfair to publicize their internal machinations). I have no need to post there the vast majority of the time. So I don't want to rock the boat by requesting the privilege....
... A few years ago, anyone at all could send articles to their mailinglist. I never saw any signs of abuse nor any spam on the list. Still, they changed the rules and restricted participation in the list (turns out that my name *is* on the list, but my ISP has changed it's addressing format).... don't want them closing down the list even further. -- J. Giles "I conclude that ...
Harold Stevens wrote: In <0E6nk.7567$cn7.6985@flpi145.ffdc.sbc.com> Gary Scott: [Snip...] What the heck does texas have to do with anything? IMO, an incredibly clumsy trolling attempt. I'm plonking 'em on sight. BTW, also in DFW, Texas. :) yup, i think we're the only Fortran users in DFW -- Gary Scott mailto:garylscott@sbcglobal dot net ...
...output data. Well, both are human readable. What you mean is naive vs. correct. Here is a part of an article I sent to the j3mailinglist couple of days ago: OK, but I think the naive form is useful more often than you say. For one, most numerical algorithms are much less accurate than ...
... article I sent to the j3mailinglist couple of days ago: ...ve ever used did that for list-directed. Why would they start ... precision they've chosen for list-directed, for one thing. And ... number they see on a listing or on the screen. Well ... output 7 decimal digits for list-directed, which satisfies neither group ... same reason they already avoid list-directed, and the naive users ...
...changed in the interim? OK. Even worse. It really *is* something I hope doesn't get approved. The following was just posted to the j3mailinglist which addresses part of the reason I think the SIZE(aScalar) is a mistake: Is the definition ARRAY argument of the SIZE intrinsic correct?...
