in between and all over again
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 3 articles for 5.058 sec
Surely it would be far less expensive to build heavily defended land based SM3 sites to counter a missile threat. I do see why sea based is desired as in a counter- force nuclear strike it may reduce the number of nuclear warheads targeted by a foe on us/allies but ships may be harder to track and prosecute a sudden attack against. I doubt the next generation of boomers will ever be built     

Group: rec.aviation.military · Group Profile · Search for in between and all over again in rec.aviation.military
Author: jkochko68
Date: Jan 28, 2010 12:11

Surely it would be far less expensive to build heavily defended land based SM3 sites to counter a missile threat. I do see why sea based is desired as in a counter- force nuclear strike it may reduce the number of nuclear warheads targeted by a foe on us/allies but ships may be harder to track and prosecute a sudden attack against. I doubt the next generation of boomers will ever be built
Show full article (41.07Kb)
Surely it would be far less expensive to build heavily defended land based SM3 sites to counter a missile threat. I do see why sea based is desired as in a counter- force nuclear strike it may reduce the number of nuclear warheads targeted by a foe on us/allies but ships may be harder to track and prosecute a sudden attack against. I doubt the next generation of boomers will ever be built     

Group: rec.aviation.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for in between and all over again in rec.aviation.military.naval
Author: jkochko68
Date: Jan 28, 2010 12:11

Show full article (41.07Kb)
    

Group: sci.military.naval · Group Profile · Search for in between and all over again in sci.military.naval
Author: jkochko68
Date: Jan 28, 2010 12:11

Show full article (41.07Kb)