Bruce Eckel wrote: So this is the kind of problem I keep running into. There will seem to be consensus that you can do everything with isolated processes message passing (and note here that I include Actors in this scenario even if their mechanism is more complex). And then someone will pipe up and say "well, of course, you have to have threads" and the argument is usually "for
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Bruce Eckel <bruceteckel@gmail.com> wrote: As some of you on this list may know, I have struggled to understand concurrency, on and off for many years, but primarily in the C++ and Java domains. As time has passed and experience has stacked up, I have become more convinced that while the world runs in parallel, we think sequentially and so shared-memory
On Aug 19, 2:59 pm, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Aug 19, 10:48 am, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote: On Aug 19, 7:48 am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Aug 19, 5:51 am, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote: "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:f6e884a5-c6a2-4e29-858f-c6ccaae9124f@a1g2000hsb
On Aug 19, 11:32 am, Firemonkey <firemonke...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Aug 19, 11:48 am, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote: On Aug 19, 7:48 am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Aug 19, 5:51 am, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote: "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:f6e884a5-c6a2-4e29-858f-c6ccaae9124f@a1g2000hsb
On Aug 19, 10:48 am, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote: On Aug 19, 7:48 am, "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@yahoo.com> wrote: On Aug 19, 5:51 am, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote: "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:f6e884a5-c6a2-4e29-858f-c6ccaae9124f@a1g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... I do, however, think he was abusing
