hamsters gone wild
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
 
 Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...
found 130 articles for 0.482 sec
On 22 May 2008 10:28:02 -0500, M C Hamster <davolson@speakeasy.nospam.net> wrote, perhaps among other things: >On Wed, 21 May 2008 20:25:06 -0700, Bill Turlock <"Bill Turlock >"@sonnnic.invalid> wrote: > >>"Paul L. Madarasz" wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, 21 May 2008 18:46:43 -0400, Boron Elgar >>> <boron_elgar@hotmail.com> wrote, perhaps among other things: >>> >>> >On 21 May 2008 16:52:05     

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for hamsters gone wild in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: Paul L. Madarasz
Date: May 22, 2008 08:36

On Wed, 21 May 2008 20:25:06 -0700, Bill Turlock <"Bill Turlock "@sonnnic.invalid> wrote: "Paul L. Madarasz" wrote: On Wed, 21 May 2008 18:46:43 -0400, Boron Elgar <boron_elgar@hotmail.com> wrote, perhaps among other things: On 21 May 2008 16:52:05 -0500, paulydak <im@home.sleepin> wrote: On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:55:35 -0400, Boron Elgar <boron_elgar@hotmail
Show full article (2.00Kb) · Show article thread
On Sat, 17 May 2008 10:55:35 -0400, Boron Elgar <boron_elgar@hotmail.com> wrote: >On 17 May 2008 09:42:02 -0500, paulydak <im@home.sleepin> wrote: > >>On Fri, 16 May 2008 18:41:20 +0100, Peter Ward <me@privacy.net> wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:07:39 -0700 (PDT), Richard R. Hershberger >>>wrote: >>> >>>>On May 15, 3:01 pm, Peter Ward <m...@privacy.net> wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 14 May     

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for hamsters gone wild in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: M C Hamster
Date: May 22, 2008 08:28

On Sat, 17 May 2008 16:45:02 -0700, ctbishop@earthlink.net (Charles Bishop) wrote: In article <h12q24138ru3ra250kklrep5le2079sn7l@4ax.com>, M C Hamster <davolson@speakeasy.nospam.net> wrote: [snip] No. Here's the definition of "hence", from M-W Online: 1: from this place : away 2 archaic : henceforth b: from this time <four years 3: because of a preceding fact
Show full article (1.74Kb) · Show article thread
In article <h12q24138ru3ra250kklrep5le2079sn7l@4ax.com>, M C Hamster <davolson@speakeasy.nospam.net> wrote: [snip] > >No. Here's the definition of "hence", from M-W Online: > >1: from this place : away >2 archaic : henceforth b: from this time <four years hence> >3: because of a preceding fact or premise : therefore >4: from this source or origin > >"This place", in my original sentence     

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for hamsters gone wild in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: paulydak
Date: May 21, 2008 14:52

On 17 May 2008 09:42:02 -0500, paulydak <im@home.sleepin> wrote: On Fri, 16 May 2008 18:41:20 +0100, Peter Ward <me@privacy.net> wrote: On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:07:39 -0700 (PDT), Richard R. Hershberger wrote: On May 15, 3:01 pm, Peter Ward <m...@privacy.net> wrote: On Wed, 14 May 2008 13:05:26 -0700 (PDT), Richard R. Hershberger wrote: [OPS and clean-up]
Show full article (3.94Kb) · Show article thread
On Fri, 16 May 2008 18:41:20 +0100, Peter Ward <me@privacy.net> wrote: >On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:07:39 -0700 (PDT), Richard R. Hershberger >wrote: > >>On May 15, 3:01 pm, Peter Ward <m...@privacy.net> wrote: >>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 13:05:26 -0700 (PDT), Richard R. Hershberger >>> wrote: >>> >>> [OPS and clean-up] > >[snip] > >>As Mr. Hamster has pointed out, the "P" in OPS is "plus". This     

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for hamsters gone wild in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: M C Hamster
Date: May 17, 2008 22:41

On 16 May 2008 16:17:01 -0500, M C Hamster wrote: On Fri, 16 May 2008 18:24:06 +0100, Peter Ward <me@privacy.net> wrote: The archetypal team is, I believe, five batsmen, five bowlers and a wicket keeper, but they are all expected to bat - no pinch hitters in cricket. If you can find a wicket keeper or bowler who's also a good batsman, so much the better. Ian Botham, for instance
Show full article (1.53Kb) · Show article thread
On 16 May 2008 18:23:02 -0500, M C Hamster wrote: >On Fri, 16 May 2008 15:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Snidely ><Snidely.too@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On May 16, 2:21 pm, M C Hamster <davol...@speakeasy.nospam.net> wrote: >>> Indeed. "A place in time" is a laughably common expression. >> >>Hmmm, I would go for "a point in time", myself. >> >>Yours at 175,000 g-hits does seem a bit common. Mine at 360     

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for hamsters gone wild in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: Charles Bishop
Date: May 17, 2008 16:45

On Fri, 16 May 2008 15:33:50 -0700 (PDT), Snidely <Snidely.too@gmail.com> wrote: On May 16, 2:21 pm, M C Hamster <davol...@speakeasy.nospam.net> wrote: Indeed. "A place in time" is a laughably common expression. Hmmm, I would go for "a point in time", myself. Yours at 175,000 g-hits does seem a bit common. Mine at 360,000 seems even more plebian. Doesn't "point" suggest
Show full article (1.05Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for hamsters gone wild in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: Boron Elgar
Date: May 17, 2008 07:55

Show full article (3.34Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for hamsters gone wild in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: paulydak
Date: May 17, 2008 07:42

Show full article (2.90Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for hamsters gone wild in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: Peter Ward
Date: May 17, 2008 01:12

Show full article (0.82Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for hamsters gone wild in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: Peter Ward
Date: May 16, 2008 17:18

Show full article (0.64Kb) · Show article thread
    

Group: alt.fan.ceciladams · Group Profile · Search for hamsters gone wild in alt.fan.ceciladams
Author: M C Hamster
Date: May 16, 2008 16:23

Show full article (0.50Kb) · Show article thread
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · next