This is guaranteed spam from unconfirmed opt-in mailing lists for spurious addresses at poopypants.com or other vanity domains. hormboy@fw.merk.com is a USENET spamtrap seed. ---------------------- From crushdarkest2@gmail.com Sat Sep 8 09:17:03 2007 Received: from mx0.public.com (mx0.public.com [66.112.160.20]) by public.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l88DH3P2010329 for <x@public
Miss Hicks wrote: On Sep 1, 11:26 am, "Dennis M. Hammes" <scrawlm...@arvig.net> wrote: Miss Hicks wrote: On Aug 31, 4:22 pm, Dale Houstman <d...@skypoint.com> wrote: Miss Hicks wrote: Shall a pale shadow and she a ghost, a phantom cost so valiant a king. So vexacious a matter this that she would with beguiling betray you wantonly
On Sep 1, 11:26 am, "Dennis M. Hammes" <scrawlm...@arvig.net> wrote: Miss Hicks wrote: On Aug 31, 4:22 pm, Dale Houstman <d...@skypoint.com> wrote: Miss Hicks wrote: Shall a pale shadow and she a ghost, a phantom cost so valiant a king. So vexacious a matter this that she would with beguiling betray you wantonly with a kiss When you torture
Miss Hicks wrote: On Aug 31, 4:22 pm, Dale Houstman <d...@skypoint.com> wrote: Miss Hicks wrote: Shall a pale shadow and she a ghost, a phantom cost so valiant a king. So vexacious a matter this that she would with beguiling betray you wantonly with a kiss When you torture language until it gibbers incoherently, does the Hague judge you harshly?
Although I certainly enjoy HODS, I agree that it does lack the character development of the original, which was the same issue the revival series had in trying to compress the entire 5-month 1795 storyline, with all its rich, heartfelt tragedy, gothic romance and family history, into just a few 1-hour episodes. The original had the luxury of time to draw the audience in that you just can't do
