Bugliosi is off the wall re: Bush. In fact, he just may be off the wall period. Just my opinion of course. John F. "John McAdams" <john.mcadams@marquette.edu> wrote in message news:3kml7497v459pkpquvoljtdgg5nqfjqkpj@4ax.com... On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:28:16 -0400, Peter Fokes<jpfCT@toronto.hm> wrote: On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:32:32 -0500, John McAdams <john.mcadams@marquette
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:28:16 -0400, Peter Fokes<jpfCT@toronto.hm> wrote: On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:32:32 -0500, John McAdams <john.mcadams@marquette.edu> wrote: On 13 Jul 2008 22:28:51 -0400, David Von Pein <davevonpein@aol.com> wrote: "Funny how people like you only have use for Bugliosi when he's bashing Bush. Where are the links to his "Reclaiming History"
On Jul 13, 5:10�pm, slats7 <uwalu...@gmail.com> wrote: On Jul 13, 12:07�pm, Peter Fokes<jp...@toronto.hm> wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtYotUN0VBk Peter Fokes, Toronto Funny how people like you only have use for Bugliosi when he's bashing Bush. Where are the links to his "Reclaiming History" lectures? I won't hold my breath. Well, Peter doesn't get to
"Funny how people like you only have use for Bugliosi when he's bashing Bush. Where are the links to his "Reclaiming History" lectures? I won't hold my breath." <<< What's one thing got to do with the other? Answer: Nothing. Two completely different subjects. So why couldn't somebody agree with Bugliosi about one of those subjects, but totally disagree with him about the
