email To 52
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
Your Ad Here
 
Advanced search
MATCHING GROUPS



more...
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

found 3 articles for 6.174 sec
[email][80.52.176.78 PL AS5617 80.48.0.0/13 gvw78.internetdsl.tpnet.pl] Fantastic and low-priced Boxed Software for All Windows and MACOS     

Group: pl.internet.mordplik · Group Profile · Search for email To 52 in pl.internet.mordplik
Author: Andrzej Filip
Date: Mar 6, 2008 09:29

...pl-internet-mordplik: Hosty PL (80.52.176.78 PL AS5617 80.48...tpnet.pl) Spam-Track: IP=80.52.176.78 Country=PL ASN=AS5617...aut-num+AS5617 RIPE.net: 80.52.176.78 http://ripe.net/fcgi-bin/whois?searchtext=80.52.176.78 L2.APEWS.org:....org/?page=test&net=80.52.0.0/14&ip=80.52.176.78 Spam-Language: en (Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::TextCat) Spam-...(gvw78.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [80.52.176.78]) by fsf.hobby-...
Show full article (2.48Kb)
[email][80.52.142.162 PL AS5617 80.48.0.0/13 guo162.internetdsl.tpnet.pl] to: <czef63-7du-7>     

Group: pl.internet.mordplik · Group Profile · Search for email To 52 in pl.internet.mordplik
Author: Andrzej Filip
Date: Feb 19, 2008 00:12

...-pl-internet-mordplik: Hosty PL (80.52.142.162 PL AS5617 80.48...tpnet.pl) Spam-Track: IP=80.52.142.162 Country=PL ASN=AS5617...aut-num+AS5617 RIPE.net: 80.52.142.162 http://ripe.net/fcgi-bin/whois?searchtext=80.52.142.162 bl.SPAMCOP.net: ....org/?page=test&net=80.52.0.0/14&ip=80.52....spamcop.net/bl.shtml?80.52.142.162>] Return-Path: <coced@... (guo162.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [80.52.142.162]) by fsf.hobby-...
Show full article (2.03Kb)
Your Ad Here
Your Ad Here
Bug#382081: mutt: date handling bug (integer overflow)     

Group: linux.debian.bugs.dist · Group Profile · Search for email To 52 in linux.debian.bugs.dist
Author: Rocco Rutte
Date: Jan 15, 2008 04:10

...* Daniele Sempione wrote: there is an integer overflow handling received emails' date, i.e. when the date is later than Tue Jan 19 04:14:07 2038. this is shown in emails' list: 52 N Dec 14 sender ( 124) subject this one's date is `Tue, 19 Jan ... to 14 Dec 1901. the displayed `Date' field of the email header doesn't change. i guess the behaviour is: ...
Show full article (0.81Kb) · Show article thread