|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Kelum PeirisKelum Peiris Date: Mar 13, 2008 14:24
When you say that as a human when Sirius can go diagonally, do you mean
going from (x,y) to (x+1,y+1) directly or first going to (x+1,y) and
then going to (x+1,y+1)?
Thank you
Kelum
|
| |
|
| | 11 Comments |
|
  |
Author: Mina RazaghpourMina Razaghpour Date: Mar 13, 2008 18:22
It means going directly from (x,y) to (x+1,y+1), or generally, walking
along the direct line between any two points (as long as he has water).
Mina
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Kelum Peiris wrote:
> When you say that as a human when Sirius can go diagonally, do you mean going
> from (x,y) to (x+1,y+1) directly or first going to (x+1,y) and then going to
> (x+1,y+1)?
>
> Thank you
> Kelum
>
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Akshay BharathAkshay Bharath Date: Mar 13, 2008 21:17
For part a), the question is asking us to describe how we are going to
build the graph and label is with time costs. So by time costs does it
mean labelling the edges between each vertex with the minimum amount
of time required to get from one end to the other? And the hint says
we should use a data representation that has a space requirement of
BigTheta m. But we will have a total of m-1 edges (since there are m+2
vertices in total). So shouldn't the data representation take up
BigTheta m-1 instead?..Or am I missing something here??
thanks,
-Akshay
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mina RazaghpourMina Razaghpour Date: Mar 14, 2008 13:34
> For part a), the question is asking us to describe how we are going to
> build the graph and label is with time costs. So by time costs does it
> mean labelling the edges between each vertex with the minimum amount
> of time required to get from one end to the other?
Yes.
>And the hint says we should use a data representation that has a space
>requirement of BigTheta m. But we will have a total of m-1 edges (since
>there are m+2 vertices in total).
This is not true.
> So shouldn't the data representation take up
> BigTheta m-1 instead?..Or am I missing something here??
Theta(m-1) is equal to Theta(m), additive constants do not matter.
Mina
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Kelum PeirisKelum Peiris Date: Mar 14, 2008 15:58
Hello,
Can Sirius move backwards, lets say from (14,7) to (12,4) in the grid
(in my test input Azkaban is at (0,21) and Quidditch is at (21,0)). I
was thinking that if he can go backward then there might be a solution
in my test input. But, if he can only go forward, then there is no solution.
Thank you.
Kelum
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mina RazaghpourMina Razaghpour Date: Mar 15, 2008 10:49
Yes, Sirius can move backwards and he needs to do that in some maps to
make the trip.
Mina
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Kelum Peiris wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can Sirius move backwards, lets say from (14,7) to (12,4) in the grid (in my
> test input Azkaban is at (0,21) and Quidditch is at (21,0)). I was thinking
> that if he can go backward then there might be a solution in my test input.
> But, if he can only go forward, then there is no solution.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Kelum
>
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Scott RycroftScott Rycroft Date: Mar 16, 2008 17:30
Also to clarify, is going from (x,y) to (x+1,y+1) considered one unit?
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:22:18 -0400, Mina Razaghpour wrote:
> It means going directly from (x,y) to (x+1,y+1), or generally, walking
> along the direct line between any two points (as long as he has water).
>
> Mina
>
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Kelum Peiris wrote:
>
>> When you say that as a human when Sirius can go diagonally, do you mean
>> going from (x,y) to (x+1,y+1) directly or first going to (x+1,y) and
>> then going to (x+1,y+1)?
>>
>> Thank you
>> Kelum
>>
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mina RazaghpourMina Razaghpour Date: Mar 16, 2008 18:16
No, this is sqrt(2) units (euclidean distance between the 2 points).
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Scott Rycroft wrote:
|
| Show full article (0.69Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Scott RycroftScott Rycroft Date: Mar 16, 2008 18:53
When the assignment says "should not take more time than running
Dijkstra’s algorithm", what version of Dijkstra's should we be comparing
to? The one we will be using or some other (possibly better or worse)
version?
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:30:58 +0000, Scott Rycroft wrote:
|
| Show full article (0.85Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
|
Author: Mina RazaghpourMina Razaghpour Date: Mar 16, 2008 20:50
|
| |
| no comments |
|
RELATED THREADS |
  |
|
|
|
|
|