Re: VAT, what a con!
  Home FAQ Contact Sign in
uk.transport only
 
Advanced search
POPULAR GROUPS

more...

 Up
Re: VAT, what a con!         

Group: uk.transport · Group Profile
Author: ®i©ardo
Date: Aug 29, 2008 13:19

®i©ardo wrote:
> Brimstone wrote:
>> ®i©ardo wrote:
>>> Brimstone wrote:
>>>> ®i©ardo wrote:
>>>>> Brimstone wrote:
>>>>>> ®i©ardo wrote:
>>>>>>> Brimstone wrote:
>>>>>>>> Knight Of The Road wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I had my car serviced today and had to give the Government
>>>>>>>>> £27.20 for the priviledge. What the fuck is that all about?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We didn't ask for loads of people to go to Iraq or Afghanistan
>>>>>>>>> to fire rockets about, we didn't ask for the 2012 Olympics,
>>>>>>>>> we're not currently demanding ID cards.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And we never wanted that Dome thing either.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> When is Gordon Brown going to realise that working-class people
>>>>>>>>> voted him in and working-class people are going to vote him out?
>>>>>>>> The Tories introduced VAT as a result of them taking us into the
>>>>>>>> EEC/EU. So, nothing to to do with Brown, blame Heath.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...and Labour fought them tooth and nail on the issue?
>>>>>> It was Thatcher who signed the Maastrict Treaty, that brought about
>>>>>> even closer integration. So for al the Tories hot air about the UK
>>>>>> remianing "independent" they're the party which has tightened the
>>>>>> links with the EU.
>>>>> ...and Labour fought them tooth and nails on the issue?
>>>> Beside the point.
>>> Not at all.
>>
>> When discussing the lack of consistency between the attitudes and
>> actions of one party, what has the behaviour of another party got to
>> do with it?
>>
> Of course, in true Socialist style it *must* be someone else's fault,
> but the Labour Party only has itself to blame by lacking the guts to
> repeal it when they came to power, had they felt it was that bad.
>
> It is much the same with the trade union legislation introduced by the
> Tories. Despite lots of windbagging at the time, nothing was
> subsequently done to repeal it by the Labour Party for the simple reason
> that, however it may have seemed at the time, the Tories had shot
> themselves in the foot by taming the unions and allowing the Labour
> Party to become electable. However, as yet again a Labour Government has
> bankrupted the country, they will soon be kowtowing to their trade union
> paymasters who are again scenting wielding power and cranking up their
> demands. Even more reliance will be put on their funding than
> previously, given that most other sources of finance are rapidly
> distancing themselves from a bankrupt party and the possibility of being
> tainted by association with rather more than whispers of dirty deeds.
>

Here's a little follow-up to my above comments. It seems I was right on
track.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/2619186/Unite-union-demands-change...

--
Moving things in still pictures!
no comments
diggit! del.icio.us! reddit!