On 8 Sep, 08:32, Tony Dragon
btinternet.com> wrote:> Doug wrote:
>> On 7 Sep, 22:18, "Brimstone"
yahoo.co.uk> wrote:>>> Doug wrote:
>>>> On 7 Sep, 08:10, "Graculus"
hotmail.co.uk>
>>>> wrote:>>>>>> At first sight the motorists who dominate this transport newsgroup
>>>>>> might think this thread is not transport related but consider this,
>>>>>> a motorist who eats meat contributes about three times as much to
>>>>>> global warming than someone who does neither.
>>>>> That is SO weak. How on earth is it transport related when all you
>>>>> do is say "someone who participates in activity A and the completely
>>>>> unrelated acivity B" has such-and-such an effect?
>>>>> Even at second sight, this is NOT transport related in any way at
>>>>> all, and you are an extremely sad specimin to try to make it so.
>>>> How do you imagine that meat is transported and what about the
>>>> vehicles involved in rearing meat?
>>> The commodity is immaterial, the same amount of goods will need to be
>>> transported. In fact, given that veg provides less than meat a higher volume
>>> of vehicle movements would be need to provide a veggie diet for the whole
>>> country.
>
>> But you and others here keep banging on about airfreighted food, which
>> is but a small subset of food in general.
>
>> BTW I counted at least five non-transport related threads posted by
>> others, not me, on the first page alone. The word 'hypocrites' springs
>> quickly to mind.
>
>
> Would you list those threads please?
>
Why? Do you have an eyesight problem?
OT help with an infestation.
Vote - Bollen's biggest lie
I'm off to work now.
Shock Discovery
OT but fantastic news!
Gollum on wikipedia - your help is required
