|
|
Up |
|
|
  |
Author: DougDoug Date: Sep 16, 2008 22:48
Be interesting to see the outcome to this. Firstly, killer motorists
tend to be treated lightly and secondly cops are treated even lighter.
Any guesses?
" traffic policeman on a training exercise reached 104mph on a country
road before losing control and killing another driver, a court has
heard.
PC Sean Schofield, 38, was driving a high-performance Volvo T5 when he
crossed on to the wrong side of the road at a bend.
The police car smashed head-on into a VW Touran, killing driver Peter
Williams, 67, and injuring his wife Jean, 65..."
More:
http://www.productsandservices.bt.com/consumerProducts/displayTopic.do?topicId=23736&s_cid...
|
| |
|
| | 14 Comments |
|
  |
Author: BrimstoneBrimstone Date: Sep 17, 2008 00:20
Doug wrote:
> Be interesting to see the outcome to this. Firstly, killer motorists
> tend to be treated lightly and secondly cops are treated even lighter.
When are you going to accept the evidence Doug?
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
  |
Author: Tony DragonTony Dragon Date: Sep 17, 2008 00:35
Doug wrote:
> Be interesting to see the outcome to this. Firstly, killer motorists
> tend to be treated lightly and secondly cops are treated even lighter.
> Any guesses?
>
> " traffic policeman on a training exercise reached 104mph on a country
> road before losing control and killing another driver, a court has
> heard.
>
> PC Sean Schofield, 38, was driving a high-performance Volvo T5 when he
> crossed on to the wrong side of the road at a bend.
>
> The police car smashed head-on into a VW Touran, killing driver Peter
> Williams, 67, and injuring his wife Jean, 65..."
>
> More:
>
> http://www.productsandservices.bt.com/consumerProducts/displayTopic.do?topicId=23736&s_cid...
>
> ...
|
| Show full article (0.93Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: Mike PMike P Date: Sep 17, 2008 01:13
Doug wrote:
> Be interesting to see the outcome to this. Firstly, killer motorists
> tend to be treated lightly and secondly cops are treated even lighter.
> Any guesses?
>
> " traffic policeman on a training exercise reached 104mph on a country
> road before losing control and killing another driver, a court has
> heard.
>
> PC Sean Schofield, 38, was driving a high-performance Volvo T5 when he
> crossed on to the wrong side of the road at a bend.
>
> The police car smashed head-on into a VW Touran, killing driver Peter
> Williams, 67, and injuring his wife Jean, 65..."
>
> More:
>
> http://www.productsandservices.bt.com/consumerProducts/displayTopic.do?topicId=23736&s_cid...
Joined Tommy in the pub this morning have you?
|
| Show full article (0.80Kb) |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: BrianWBrianW Date: Sep 17, 2008 01:34
On 17 Sep, 06:48, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
> Be interesting to see the outcome to this. Firstly, killer motorists
> tend to be treated lightly and secondly cops are treated even lighter.
> Any guesses?
You really like to make yourself a hostage to fortune, don't you
Gollum? One would have thought you would have learned from the "Miles
Cooper was a motorist terrorist" fiasco, where you made an even bigger
arse of yourself than usual. I can only conclude that you enjoy being
humiliated and laughed at, Gollum.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: FodFod Date: Sep 17, 2008 01:45
On Sep 17, 6:48Â am, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
> Be interesting to see the outcome to this.
I'd be interested to see what you would suggest as a way to train
police to drive at high speed.
Fod
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Date: Sep 17, 2008 01:56
"Fod" googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:d1794e35-9ff2-4ee4-b9bf-f313a22e1edc@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 17, 6:48 am, Doug riseup.net> wrote:
>> Be interesting to see the outcome to this.
> I'd be interested to see what you would suggest as a way to train
> police to drive at high speed.
They shouldn't be allowed cars at all , eliminating the need.
It's frivolous hypermobility and they should use a pedal cycle instead
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
Author: AdrianAdrian Date: Sep 17, 2008 02:05
"Dr Zoidberg" drzoidberg.co.uk> gurgled happily,
sounding much like they were saying:
>>> Be interesting to see the outcome to this.
>> I'd be interested to see what you would suggest as a way to train
>> police to drive at high speed.
> They shouldn't be allowed cars at all , eliminating the need. It's
> frivolous hypermobility and they should use a pedal cycle instead
No, no, no. In Duhg's anarchic utopia, there wouldn't BE any police.
There wouldn't be any need for them, either, because everybody would live
happily in harmony, hugging trees and fluffy bunny-rabbits.
|
| |
| 1 Comment |
|
  |
Author: Tony DragonTony Dragon Date: Sep 17, 2008 08:15
Adrian wrote:
> "Dr Zoidberg" drzoidberg.co.uk> gurgled happily,
> sounding much like they were saying:
>
>>>> Be interesting to see the outcome to this.
>
>>> I'd be interested to see what you would suggest as a way to train
>>> police to drive at high speed.
>
>> They shouldn't be allowed cars at all , eliminating the need. It's
>> frivolous hypermobility and they should use a pedal cycle instead
>
> No, no, no. In Duhg's anarchic utopia, there wouldn't BE any police.
> There wouldn't be any need for them, either, because everybody would live
> happily in harmony, hugging trees and fluffy bunny-rabbits.
Fluffy bunny rabbits go well in a casserole (without the fluff)
--
Tony the Dragon
|
| |
| no comments |
|
  |
|
|
  |
Author: JNugentJNugent Date: Sep 17, 2008 08:45
Doug wrote:
> Be interesting to see the outcome to this. Firstly, killer motorists
> tend to be treated lightly and secondly cops are treated even lighter.
> Any guesses?
[ snip ]
Why did you do that? You got it right first time and then hopelessly wrong
the second time - in the same sentence!
A. "...tend to be treated lightly" - whether factually correct or not, that
is the correct syntax.
B. "... are treated even lighter" - wrong (it should be: "are treated even
more lightly").
It isn't you who created some of those Highways Agency gantry signs, was it?
You know the one of which I'm thinking:
"Don't Drive Tired".
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|