> On 10 Sep, 17:15, "Mike P"
privacy.net> wrote:>> Doug wrote:
>>> On 10 Sep, 08:57, BrianW
hotmail.com> wrote:>>>> On 10 Sep, 07:36, Doug
riseup.net> wrote:>>
>>>>> On 10 Sep, 07:09, "Graculus"
hotmail.co.uk>
>>>>> wrote:>>
>>>>>> "Doug"
riseup.net> wrote in message>>
>>
>>>>>>> On 10 Sep, 06:54, "Graculus"
hotmail.co.uk>
>>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>> "Doug"
riseup.net> wrote in message>>
>>>>>>>>news:74aa2bc1-667f-4c1e-bf54-4c509f66085a@
d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>> "A site called "LivingSpace" has been created, it attempts to
>>>>>>>> describe the environmental impact of the automobile.
>>
>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>
>>>>>>>> How can I take seriously a web site whose very first sentence on
>>>>>>>> the home page contains grammatical errors? It shows a lack of
>>>>>>>> thoroughness and care.
>>>>>>>> And it doesn't seem to be particularly UK related, so, once
>>>>>>>> again, off topic.
>>
>>>>>>> Why would I expect you, a motorist, to take anything seriously?
>>
>>>>>> Ha ha ha ha ha! So, you have just dismissed the clear majarity of
>>>>>> the population as not taking anything seriously. And with
>>>>>> statements like that, are we expected to take YOU seriously?
>>
>>>>> Motorists are only a small majority, aka mob.
>>
>>>> Another GollumLie.
>>
>>> Wrong ID as usual. Accuracy is not your strong point.
>>
>>>> At least 70%% of the population are motorists - a
>>>> large majority.
>>
>>> Wrong again. There are 27 million cars.
>>
>> Source?
>>
Hey guys, STOP! Don't you realise, all this pissing around with precise
numbers is typical Doug distraction tactics in order to avoid the point.
What the hell does it matter if there are 20 million, 30 million or 40
million drivers (note, not cars)? The point is, there are a lot of them, and
Doug has dismissed them all as not serious if one fell swoop.
Doug, would you care to justify your statement "Why would I expect you, a
motorist, to take anything seriously" which would imply that being a
motorist implies not taking anything seriously?
