On 10 Sep, 17:11, Doug
riseup.net> wrote:> On 10 Sep, 16:31, BrianW
hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> On 10 Sep, 15:56, Doug
riseup.net> wrote:>
>>> On 10 Sep, 08:57, BrianW
hotmail.com> wrote:>
>>>> On 10 Sep, 07:36, Doug
riseup.net> wrote:>
>>>>> On 10 Sep, 07:09, "Graculus"
hotmail.co.uk>
>>>>> wrote:>
>>>>>> "Doug"
riseup.net> wrote in message>
>
>>>>>>> On 10 Sep, 06:54, "Graculus"
hotmail.co.uk>
>>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>> "Doug"
riseup.net> wrote in message>
>>>>>>>>news:74aa2bc1-667f-4c1e-bf54-4c509f66085a@
d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>> "A site called "LivingSpace" has been created, it attempts to describe
>>>>>>>> the environmental impact of the automobile.
>
>
>>>>>>>> ---
>
>>>>>>>> How can I take seriously a web site whose very first sentence on the home
>>>>>>>> page contains grammatical errors? It shows a lack of thoroughness and
>>>>>>>> care.
>>>>>>>> And it doesn't seem to be particularly UK related, so, once again, off
>>>>>>>> topic.
>
>>>>>>> Why would I expect you, a motorist, to take anything seriously?
>
>>>>>> Ha ha ha ha ha! So, you have just dismissed the clear majarity of the
>>>>>> population as not taking anything seriously. And with statements like that,
>>>>>> are we expected to take YOU seriously?
>
>>>>> Motorists are only a small majority, aka mob.
>
>>>> Another GollumLie.
>
>>> Wrong ID as usual. Accuracy is not your strong point.
>
>> Sorry, I should have said "another BollenLie"
>
>>>> �At least 70%% of the population are motorists - a
>>>> large majority.
>
>>> Wrong again. There are 27 million cars. So how many motorists do you
>>> think own more than one car?
>
>> More than 70%% of adults have a driving licence and are therefore, by
>> your definition, motorists.
>
> Source?
