Fod wrote:
> On Sep 1, 3:56 pm, BrianW
hotmail.com> wrote:>> On 1 Sep, 15:41, "Mike P"
privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>> "Tommy"
googlemail.com> wrote in message>>
>>
>>
>>>> Yup, Gollum will believe any old crap if it happens to coincide
>>>> with
>>>> one of his pathetic little prejudices. Remember his glee when he
>>>> found an article on NASA's site which appeared to back up his "two
>>>> ozones" hypothesis? Of course, the article in question was aimed at
>>>> children, and was therefore considerably dumbed down, although
>>>> evidently not by enough for Gollum.
>>
>>>> Gullible? BrianW is just a -ve version ofDoug - both choosing to
>>>> be blind to any facts they disagree with and lacking any common
>>>> sense - no winder Bri hates him :)
>>
>>> Hmm this bit doesn't make too much sense.
>>
>> Just as Gollum could use his ability to be "100%% wrong 100%% of the
>> time" in a profitable manner, Toomtard could use his ability to post
>> incoherent fuckwitted drivel in order to benefit mankind. I am
>> thinking that perhaps he could be used to provide a totally secure
>> cryptography service. If, for example, the message to be transmitted
>> was "Attack at dawn", Toomy would probably translate this as "BUT THE
>> you are TFL tried to fuxxin angry man". That, of course, would be
>> incomprensible to all other humans, bar one. The exception is Gollum,
>> who has in the past stated that he has no trouble understanding
>> Toomtard. Gollum, therefore, could unscramble the messages at the
>> other end.
>>
>> How about it, Gollum and Toomtard - you could for the first time in
>> your lives make yourselves useful?
>
> who should doug attack?
>
The same people as usual, anyone and everyone.
