well done Fod,
Put the correct phrase as I originally posted into a search engine and
you'll see it was directly from a news feed (but thnxxxxxxxx anyway)
Never mind - keep repeating the lie and you might even believe the crap you
post here - :)
"Fod"
googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:21c8ff98-fada-4c7d-b85f-4ca970912529@p25g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 1, 3:56 pm, BrianW hotmail.com> wrote:> On 1 Sep, 15:41, "Mike P"
privacy.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> "Tommy"
googlemail.com> wrote in message>
>
>
>>> Yup, Gollum will believe any old crap if it happens to coincide with
>>> one of his pathetic little prejudices. Remember his glee when he
>>> found an article on NASA's site which appeared to back up his "two
>>> ozones" hypothesis? Of course, the article in question was aimed at
>>> children, and was therefore considerably dumbed down, although
>>> evidently not by enough for Gollum.
>
>>> Gullible? BrianW is just a -ve version ofDoug - both choosing to be
>>> blind
>>> to any facts they disagree with and lacking any common sense - no
>>> winder
>>> Bri hates him :)
>
>> Hmm this bit doesn't make too much sense.
>
> Just as Gollum could use his ability to be "100%% wrong 100%% of the
> time" in a profitable manner, Toomtard could use his ability to post
> incoherent fuckwitted drivel in order to benefit mankind. I am
> thinking that perhaps he could be used to provide a totally secure
> cryptography service. If, for example, the message to be transmitted
> was "Attack at dawn", Toomy would probably translate this as "BUT THE
> you are TFL tried to fuxxin angry man". That, of course, would be
> incomprensible to all other humans, bar one. The exception is Gollum,
> who has in the past stated that he has no trouble understanding
> Toomtard. Gollum, therefore, could unscramble the messages at the
> other end.
>
> How about it, Gollum and Toomtard - you could for the first time in
> your lives make yourselves useful?
who should doug attack?
Fod
