|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: Ray HaddadRay Haddad Date: Aug 23, 2008 04:51
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:37:25 +0100, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and %%steve%%@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) instead replied:
>Ray Haddad perthmagic.com> wrote:
>>> A person such as yourself should remain silent on a newsgroup and be
>> thought a fool rather than type and remove all doubt.
>
>Thought up that all by yourself did you?
>
>Oh no, it's just another net wannabee armed with a dictionary of
>quotations.
And you believe your own reply was original? At least I paraphrased.
Look it up.
--
Ray
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Date: Aug 23, 2008 05:57
Ray Haddad perthmagic.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:37:25 +0100, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and %%steve%%@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) instead replied:
> >>Ray Haddad perthmagic.com> wrote:
>>>>> A person such as yourself should remain silent on a newsgroup and be
>>> thought a fool rather than type and remove all doubt.
>>
>>Thought up that all by yourself did you?
>>
>>Oh no, it's just another net wannabee armed with a dictionary of
>>quotations.
>
> And you believe your own reply was original? At least I paraphrased.
What an intellectual giant you are.
> Look it up.
I don't need to.
|
| Show full article (0.80Kb) |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: Ray HaddadRay Haddad Date: Aug 23, 2008 10:02
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:57:44 +0100, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and %%steve%%@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) instead replied:
>Ray Haddad perthmagic.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:37:25 +0100, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>> and %%steve%%@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) instead replied:
>> >>>Ray Haddad
|
| Show full article (1.22Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Steve CapleSteve Caple Date: Aug 23, 2008 10:24
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:51:19 +0800, Ray Haddad wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:37:25 +0100, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
> and %%steve%%@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) instead replied:
> >>Ray Haddad perthmagic.com> wrote:
>>>>> A person such as yourself should remain silent on a newsgroup and be
>>> thought a fool rather than type and remove all doubt.
>>
>>Thought up that all by yourself did you?
>>
>>Oh no, it's just another net wannabee armed with a dictionary of
>>quotations.
>
> And you believe your own reply was original? At least I paraphrased.
>
> Look it up.
|
| Show full article (0.85Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Ray HaddadRay Haddad Date: Aug 23, 2008 10:55
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 10:24:20 -0700, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and Steve Caple commoncast.net> instead replied:
>On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 19:51:19 +0800, Ray Haddad wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:37:25 +0100, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
>> and %%steve%%@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) instead replied:
>> >>>Ray Haddad...
|
| Show full article (1.05Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Aug 23, 2008 13:06
Ray Haddad perthmagic.com> wrote:
> Let's see. All this from a guy who can't see that the headers of
> this thread are all in Railroad related newsgroups.
That statement made by someone too stupid to realise that I had already
pointed out that I was seeing responses from children who still play
with toy trains.
> Are you really so stupid as to take on folk in another newsgroup just for
> sport and not expect to become someone's chewtoy? Seriously, mate?
You think this lame blubbering makes you look like something other than
a complete fuckwit, "mate"? Anyway, you antipodean arsewit your
girlfriend is calling. "Baaa Baaa Baaa."
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: TwibilTwibil Date: Aug 23, 2008 13:55
On Aug 23, 12:57 am, "Mike P" privacy.net> wrote:
>>*I* play with trains, and when they last ran me through the Stanford-
>>Binet I.Q. tests I scored 168.
>
> It means you can do an IQ test, but it doesn't mean you can function and
> communicate in the real world.
Okay, let's see about those, shall we?
Functions to date: successful (A) instructor at the University of
California, (B) musician, (C) luthier, (D) graphic artist, (E) live
music radio show host, (F) investor.
Communications: Successful freelance *and* technical writer. See also
"musician" and "graphic artist", above.
Retired at age 56 to my hilltop home where I do pretty much exactly
what I want to do, all day and every day.
So you were saying?
> I know some seriously *odd* people with
> *very* high IQs.
"Odd* in this context simply means that you don't understand why they
do what they do. And this is not surprising.
|
| Show full article (1.37Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: TwibilTwibil Date: Aug 23, 2008 14:03
On Aug 23, 3:37 am, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
>>> (sotto voce - are all the morons who play with toy trains really as dumb
>>> as this one?)
>
>> *I* play with trains,
>
> I didn't need to be told.
So you claim to be a mind reader? How fascinating!
>> and when they last ran me through the Stanford-
>> Binet I.Q. tests I scored 168.
>
> And yet you still have an enormous chip on your shoulder, failed
> academically and have a crap job.[1] Why is this?
It isn't. See my reply to Mike P.
> Which is about as believeable as the crap you spouted.
Shrug. Truth is truth. If you don't care to deal with it, I suggest
you stop insulting entire categories of people; some of whom in any
large group are almost certain to be a lot smarter than you are. And
better able to express it, as well.
|
| Show full article (1.18Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Date: Aug 23, 2008 14:20
> On Aug 23, 3:37 am, %%ste...@ malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote:
> >>>> (sotto voce - are all the morons who play with toy trains really as dumb
>>>> as this one?)
>>
>>> *I* play with trains,
>>
>> I didn't need to be told.
>
> So you claim to be a mind reader? How fascinating!
No, I don't need to be a mind reader, you've shown classical signs of
retarded development in your chldish need to boast. It's therefore
obvious that of the cross-posted groups you are most likely to belong to
the one for children of all ages.
|
| Show full article (2.09Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: ConorConor Date: Aug 23, 2008 15:07
> On Aug 23, 12:57 am, "Mike P" privacy.net> wrote:
> >>>*I* play with trains, and when they last ran me through the Stanford-
>>>Binet I.Q. tests I scored 168.
>>
>> It means you can do an IQ test, but it doesn't mean you can function and
>> communicate in the real world.
>
> Okay, let's see about those, shall we?
>
> Functions to date: successful (A) instructor at the University of
> California,
I'm a truck driver. I've also been an instructor.
> (B) musician,
|
| Show full article (1.32Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
