> On 24 Aug, 19:38, ®i©ardo nowhere.com> wrote:

>> Squashme wrote:

>>> On 24 Aug, 13:09, Tony Dragon btinternet.com> wrote:

>>>> Squashme wrote:

>>>>> On 24 Aug, 11:28, Steve in Herts wrote:

>>>>>> On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 03:24:27 -0700 (PDT), Boltar
>>>>>> yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>>>>>>> On 24 Aug, 11:12, Steve in Herts wrote:

>>>>>>>> Terrorist cyclists again responsible for unlawful killing
>>>>>>>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article4597101.ece

>>>>>>> We need to have armed police stationed in these estates permanantly.
>>>>>>> Its the only way to sort out these violent little shits.
>>>>>>> I remember seeing a video years ago of a texan policeman being
>>>>>>> threatened by some nutter with a knife. In this country they'd have
>>>>>>> probably called in some negotiator and spent 3 hours trying to talk to
>>>>>>> the moron as his drugs wore off. Over there the texan cop just blew a
>>>>>>> hole in his chest with a shotgun and that was the end of the
>>>>>>> situation. Pity we don't use that approach a bit more often - you
>>>>>>> threaten someone with a weapon and you pay with your life.
>>>>>>> B2003

>>>>>> But these people were cyclists and there was probably a motorist
>>>>>> somewhere to blame for the death of the poor 16 year-old lad.

>>>>> Don't worry. Those of them that survive will mature into motorists and
>>>>> therefore good citizens.
>>>>> I was going to post a link to this story 3 days ago to give you guys
>>>>> something to gnaw on, but even I thought better of it.

>>>> Have you had your GCSE results in 'bollocks' yet?

>>> Yes, a fail, I'm afraid. So you've got me here for another year. Sigh.

>> Strange that, had you down fro A++.
>>

>
> That's what I got, but in Bollocks, that is a fail. You should take a
> course in it. You could skip the first term very likely.
>