|
|
 Up |
|
|
  |
Author: DougDoug Date: May 29, 2008 21:45
This clearly illustrates how cosseted motorists operate under a
different set of laws to other people. Had this killer been using his
own car to kill someone, instead of being a taxi passenger, he would
have been charged with dangerous driving, or manslaughter at the very
worst, instead of murder.
"A man who killed a taxi driver by mowing him down with his own
vehicle has been jailed for life.
A jury at Maidstone Crown Court found Luke Aujila, 21, of Dorchester
Road, Gravesend, Kent, guilty of murdering Gian Chand Bajar.
Judge Andrew Patience sentenced him to life with a minimum of 20 years
for killing the 71-year-old in Gravesend on 23 May, 2007.
As he sentenced Aujila, he described what he had done as "utterly
wicked".
Aujila had admitted manslaughter but denied murder claiming he was so
drunk he did not see Mr Bajar in the road.
But the Judge said Aujila had never intended to pay for his cab
journey..."
More:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/kent/7425378.stm
|
| Show full article (1.08Kb) |
|
| | 35 Comments |
|
|
Author: GraculusGraculus Date: May 29, 2008 22:50
> This clearly illustrates how cosseted motorists operate under a
> different set of laws to other people. Had this killer been using his
> own car to kill someone, instead of being a taxi passenger, he would
> have been charged with dangerous driving, or manslaughter at the very
> worst, instead of murder.
How on earth do you come to a ridiculous conclusion like that? They guy was
a madman, he murdered someone, he's gone down for life. Even then, you're
not satisfied, and try to claim some sort of priviledge for motorists.
Please point out exactly which sentences in the news article you cite lead
you to your conclusions?
|
| |
|
| | no comments |
|
|
Author: DougDoug Date: May 29, 2008 22:59
On 30 May, 06:50, "Graculus" hotmail.co.uk>
wrote:>> This clearly illustrates how cosseted motorists operate under a
>> different set of laws to other people. Had this killer been using his
>> own car to kill someone, instead of being a taxi passenger, he would
>> have been charged with dangerous driving, or manslaughter at the very
>> worst, instead of murder.
>
> How on earth do you come to a ridiculous conclusion like that? They guy was
> a madman, he murdered someone, he's gone down for life. Even then, you're
> not satisfied, and try to claim some sort of priviledge for motorists.
> Please point out exactly which sentences in the news...
|
| Show full article (1.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: AdrianAdrian Date: May 30, 2008 00:25
Doug riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:
> The very existence of a charge like 'dangerous driving', where a killing
> is involved, is ample evidence enough. You don't hear of 'dangerous
> knifing' or 'dangerous kicking' do you.
One of these days, the concept of "intent" will cross your tiny
little mind.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: GraculusGraculus Date: May 30, 2008 01:02
> On 30 May, 06:50, "Graculus" hotmail.co.uk>
> wrote:>>> This clearly illustrates how cosseted motorists operate under a
>>> different set of laws to other people. Had this killer been using his
>>> own car to kill someone, instead of being a taxi passenger, he would
>>> have been charged with dangerous driving, or manslaughter at the very
>>> worst, instead of murder.
>>
>> How on earth do you come to a ridiculous conclusion like that? They guy
>> was
>> a madman, he murdered someone, he's gone down for life. Even then, you're
>> not satisfied, and try to claim some sort of priviledge for motorists.
>> Please point out exactly which sentences in the news article you cite
>> lead ...
|
| Show full article (1.79Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Brian WhiteheadBrian Whitehead Date: May 30, 2008 01:22
On 30 May, 05:45, Doug riseup.net> wrote:> This clearly illustrates how cosseted motorists operate under a
> different set of laws to other people. Had this killer been using his
> own car to kill someone, instead of being a taxi passenger, he would
> have been charged with dangerous driving, or manslaughter at the very
> worst, instead of murder.
Erm, Gollum, the story you have posted is an example of someone using
a car to kill someone, being convicted of murder and given a life
sentence. It therefore undermines the very point you are trying to
make.
Christ, you *really* are stupid, Gollum. How do you do it?
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BrimstoneBrimstone Date: May 30, 2008 01:24
Brian Whitehead wrote:
> On 30 May, 05:45, Doug riseup.net> wrote:>> This clearly illustrates how cosseted motorists operate under a
>> different set of laws to other people. Had this killer been using his
>> own car to kill someone, instead of being a taxi passenger, he would
>> have been charged with dangerous driving, or manslaughter at the very
>> worst, instead of murder.
>
> Erm, Gollum, the story you have posted is an example of someone using
> a car to kill someone, being convicted of murder and given a life
> sentence. It therefore undermines the very point you are trying to
> make.
>
> Christ, you *really* are stupid, Gollum. How do you do it?
Skill, dedication and a sense of total desperation that he's losing. Given
his delusional rantings he will only get worse and become an object of even
greater ridicule - if that's possible.
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: Brian WhiteheadBrian Whitehead Date: May 30, 2008 01:30
On 30 May, 09:24, "Brimstone" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:> Brian Whitehead wrote:
>> On 30 May, 05:45, Doug riseup.net> wrote:>>> This clearly illustrates how cosseted motorists operate under a
>>> different set of laws to other people. Had this killer been using his
>>> own car to kill someone, instead of being a taxi passenger, he would
>>> have been charged with dangerous driving, or manslaughter at the very
>>> worst, instead of murder.
>
>> Erm, Gollum, the story you have posted is an example of someone using
>> a car to kill someone, being convicted of murder and given a life
>> sentence. It therefore undermines the very point you are trying to
>> make.
>
>> Christ, you *really* are stupid, Gollum. How do you do it?
>
> Skill, dedication and a sense of...
|
| Show full article (1.28Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
Author: BrimstoneBrimstone Date: May 30, 2008 01:39
Brian Whitehead wrote:
> On 30 May, 09:24, "Brimstone" yahoo.co.uk> wrote:>> Brian Whitehead wrote:
>>> On 30 May, 05:45, Doug riseup.net> wrote:>>>> This clearly illustrates how cosseted motorists operate under a
>>>> different set of laws to other people. Had this killer been using
>>>> his own car to kill someone, instead of being a taxi passenger, he
>>>> would have been charged with dangerous driving, or manslaughter at
>>>> the very worst, instead of murder.
>>
>>> Erm, Gollum, the story you have posted is an example of someone
>>> using a car to kill someone, being convicted of murder and given a
>>> life sentence. It therefore undermines the very point you are
>>> trying to make.
>>
>>> Christ, you *really* are stupid, Gollum. How do you do it?
>>
>> Skill, dedication and a sense of total desperation that he's losing.
>> Given his delusional rantings he will only get worse and become an
>> object of even greater ridicule - if that's possible. ...
|
| Show full article (1.62Kb) |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Author: PartacPartac Date: May 30, 2008 01:58
> "A man who killed a taxi driver by mowing him down with his own
> vehicle has been jailed for life.
>
> A jury at Maidstone Crown Court found Luke Aujila, 21, of Dorchester
> Road, Gravesend, Kent, guilty of murdering Gian Chand Bajar.
Er....sorry to be pedantic, but doesn't this mean that a pedestrian (Aujila)
murdered a motorist (Bajar) ????
|
| |
| no comments |
|
|
|
|
