> On 9 Jun, 08:52, Tony Dragon btinternet.com> wrote:

>> Doug wrote:

>>> On 8 Jun, 09:13, francis yahoo.com> wrote:

>>>> On Jun 8, 7:44 am, Doug riseup.net> wrote:

>>>>> On 7 Jun, 17:00, NotMe googlemail.com> wrote:

>>>>>> On 7 Jun, 05:29, Doug riseup.net> wrote:

>>>>>>> Typical motorist behaviour. Something similar happened in the UK a
>>>>>>> while back. Actually passers by didn't ignore him, they stood in the
>>>>>>> road nearby and were obviously scared of being run over themselves, as
>>>>>>> anyone who watched the news video could see.

>>>>>> Many motorists and pedestrians were too scared to take any action due
>>>>>> to the general lawlessness of the area.
>>>>>> In many places in the land of Pleb Pleb people are too scared to
>>>>>> assist in cases like this, in case some gangster comes back to finish
>>>>>> off the victim.
>>>>>> Gangs of lawless thugs are only going to make situations like this
>>>>>> more common, both in this country and in Pleb Pleb land.
>>>>>> So Dougtard, your continual support of lawlessness is what causes
>>>>>> things like this.

>>>>> What makes you seriously imagine I support the lawlessness of killer
>>>>> motorists? You must be off your trolly, NutYou!
>>>>> Had you seen the original video
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PvO9Y1OHhY
>>>>> you would know that he was struck by a hit-and-run motorist trying to
>>>>> overtake on the wrong side of the road, a not unfamiliar occurrence.
>>>>> The only lawlessness the peds were scared of was the same sort of
>>>>> general lawlessness which pervades our public roads and puts many
>>>>> lives at risk.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Carfree Citieshttp://www.carfree.com/
>>>>> Promoting practical alternatives to car dependence - walking, cycling
>>>>> and public transport.

>>>> Thank you for your input to this newsgroup Doug

>>> No problem. I take it then that you agree with the points I raised?
>>> --
>>> World Carfree Network
>>> http://www.worldcarfree.net/
>>> Help for your car-addicted friends in the U.K.

>> Where did he say that?
>>

> Well thanking me for my input certainly implies that he does. Anyway,
> he could hardly refute the evidence of the video could he?
>
> --
> UK Radical Campaigns
> www.zing.icom43.net
> A driving licence is a licence to kill.