> On 16 Dec, 16:59, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:

>> In article <13m97pje0ege...@corp.supernews.com>, Martin² says...
>>

>>> By now there can't be many drivers who think speed cameras are anything more
>>> then random tax collecting machines, even catching out a chief traffic
>>> police officer.

>>
>> I don't think they are but then again I've managed to avoid being
>> caught by a bright flourescent reflective yellow box on a pole whose
>> presence in the area is clearly marked by warning signs.
>>
>> The only tax they are is a tax on the stupid and blind drivers.
>>

> So you admit the cameras sometimes stop you speeding and breaking the
> law so not ONLY serve for collecting tax?
>

> In article <09c23207-1b79-4ad2-8b15-c3b9cab7d8d8
> @b1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>, Doug says...
>

>> On 16 Dec, 16:59, Conor hotmail.com> wrote:

>>> In article <13m97pje0ege...@corp.supernews.com>, Martin² says...

>

>>>> By now there can't be many drivers who think speed cameras are anything more
>>>> then random tax collecting machines, even catching out a chief traffic
>>>> police officer.

>

>>> I don't think they are but then again I've managed to avoid being
>>> caught by a bright flourescent reflective yellow box on a pole whose
>>> presence in the area is clearly marked by warning signs.

>

>>> The only tax they are is a tax on the stupid and blind drivers.

>

>> So you admit the cameras sometimes stop you speeding and breaking the
>> law so not ONLY serve for collecting tax?

> ...