On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 12:39:39 +0100, "Brimstone"
yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>Petert wrote:
>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:36:03 +0100, Derek
miniac.demon.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 23:27:54 -0700 (PDT), Doug
riseup.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1 Sep, 18:47, Adrian
gmail.com> wrote:>>>>> Doug
riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
>>>>> were saying:
>>>>>>>>>>> So they are allowed to drive around untaxed for up to 27 days?
>>>>>
>>>>> No.
>>>>>
>>>> It says: "The operation, which will run initially for two weeks,
>>>> will enforce
>>>> the law against vehicles which have been untaxed for 28 days or
>>>> more."
>>>
>>> It is against the law to use on a road maintained at public expense
>>> any vehicle upon which the VED has not been paid.
>>
>> Does that include roads that haven't been "adopted" by the local
>> authority?
>
>Is a road that hasn't been adopted by the local authority maintained at
>public expense?
>
Probably not, but you may be charged with many traffic offences whilst
in a car park - such as Tesco or Asda - they are certainly not
maintained at the public expense
--
Only some ghastly, dehumanised moron would want to get rid of the Routemaster.
Ken Livingstone 2001.
PeterT - "Reply to" address is a spam trap - all replies to the group please
